[ad_1]
The family lawyer, Epözdemir, stated that they wanted the most severe punishment for Cemal Metin Avcı, the defendant in the ongoing case at the 3rd High Criminal Court of Muğla.
Confirming the allegations that a CHP deputy called Sıddık Gültekin, the father of the murdered Pınar Gültekin during the trial process, and demanded to “drop the case”, Epözdemir said: “I spoke with the painful father. He said he had received that phone. The father will announce the name of the deputy who is calling, after the hearing on January 4, “he said.
Stating that he will not disclose the name of the CHP delegate in accordance with his client’s request, due to professional ethics, professional principles and rules, Epözdemir said: “Therefore, the statement was true. My client will explain it in detail in the first hearing, “he said.
Fatih Çekirge of the Hürriyet newspaper took to his corner allegations that a CHP deputy opened a phone call to Pınar Gültekin’s father, Sıddık Gültekin, who was brutally murdered, and asked to ‘desist from his complaint’.
“IF THERE IS SUCH A THING, WE DO NOT LOOK AT IT AS A PARTY”
Cekirge, speaking with CHP Group Vice President Özgür Özel, said: “Fatih Bey, we read your article early in the morning and presented it to our president. I wanted to investigate all the details of this incident. Of course, such a thing is unacceptable for us. Therefore, we held a video conference with 4 MPs from Muğla. ” Three of them said they did not know the family at all. Someone said that Pınar had called his father and was in condolence but did not make such a speech. “
Stating that lawyer Epözdemir confirmed the incident, Çekirge said from Özgür Özel: “We will speak to both Rezan Bey and Pınar’s father according to the instructions we have received from our president. As a result, we will do whatever is necessary. He said,” we do not tolerate “.
MESSAGE FROM THE DEPUTY OF CHP MUĞLA
Cekirge stated that he was later called in by CHP MP Muğla Süleyman Girgin, and included the opening sent by Girdin. Here’s that explanation …
“I read your article about the murder of Pınar Gültekin with horror like everyone else and was shocked. As 4 MPs from Muğla, who were suspects for the mention of a MP from Muğla in the article, we quickly met with a video call. We evaluated the Article As the only member of parliament who opened the phone to Pınar Gültekin’s father, Sıddık Gültekin, who is the subject of his article, I was of the opinion that it was I who needed to clarify the matter.
After the body was buried in the Hizan district of Bitlis on July 22, I had a 1-1.5 minute interview with him on my mobile phone at around 18.57 on July 23. During the meeting, I only conveyed my condolences and regret for the incident. It is not possible for me to use the expressions mentioned in the article. Definitely not a face-to-face meeting, not a message, not a phone call with Ayten Avcı, whose son committed a monstrous murder, was possible after the incident. We have been following this incident and the case from day one. As Muğla MPs, we will do our best to punish the murderer in the severest way without any discount. In light of your article today, I felt the need to explain what happened on the subject to a valued journalist like you. Attentively.”
EVENT
Pınar Gültekin (27), a student at Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University, Department of Economics, left her home where she lived alone in Akyaka district on July 16 and, after speaking with her sister by phone on the same day, never he heard about her. In the study, which began after his family reported the disappearance to the Akyaka Gendarmerie Command, a list of people who knew Gültekin was made and the records of the security cameras in the region were examined and the testimonies were taken. of eyewitnesses.
The girl’s ex-boyfriend, Cemal Metin Avcı, who was arrested on suspicion, confessed in his first statement that he did not accept the accusations against him, but when the evidence was revealed, he killed Gültekin, with whom he had been friends for some time , in the vineyard house, and after burning her body, he threw her into the forest area in Gülağzı. The murder suspect, Avcı, was arrested by the criminal judge on duty.
Cemal Metin Avcı’s brother, Mertcan Avcı, was also detained by gendarmerie teams after telephone signals were detected in and around the place at the same time as his brother in the framework of the investigation. On October 2, he was detained by the magistrate on duty, where he was released accused of “blackening the evidence.”
CASE PROCESS
In the indictment accepted by the 3rd High Criminal Court of Muğla, Cemal Metin Avcı was asked to be sentenced to aggravated life imprisonment for “murder with monstrous sentiment or torment”, and his brother Mertcan Avcı for “destroying, concealing or changing criminal evidence “to 5 years in prison. .
At the first hearing on November 9, which lasted about 10 hours, the judicial board requested the continuation of the detention of the accused, a letter addressed to the 1st Board of Specialization in Forensic Medicine corresponding to the Istanbul Institute of Forensic Medicine to determine the exact cause of death of Pınar Gültekin and the expert and expert in investigation of the crime scene. decided to do a scan at the site and postponed the hearing until January 4, 2021.
