[ad_1]
Erol Mütercimler, who was imprisoned from nine months to one year and six months for “humiliating a sector of the people on grounds of social class, religion, sect, gender and regional differences”, appeared before the judge in a television program to which attended. The translators demanded his acquittal, saying “I am not defending my words in this case because it is not my own opinion.”
According to the news from Sputnik in Turkey, the 12th Istanbul Criminal Court in the first trial, the accused was treated by Erol Interpreters 4 lawyers.
Industry and Technology Minister Mustafa Varank, Anadolu Agency Chairman and CEO Şenol Kazancı, President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan’s son Bilal Erdoğan, and 9 plaintiffs, including the Science Diffusion Society and KADEM, represented lawyers.
Erol Mütercimler, the defendant who makes the defense, said that the words of the television program mentioned in the indictment belong to him.
Stating that there was absolutely no intention in his statement, Mütercimler continued as follows:
“My 42 years are over as a lecturer. I have been on television for 23 years without interruption. There were discussions about Imam Hatip from time to time in my faculty, profession, and programming department. I, too, participated in these discussions. I have constantly criticized the number of schools and I have always shared my thoughts as a teacher on how to improve them. “
Claiming that he never said that imam hatip schools were unnecessary during his teaching, on the contrary, he always claimed that these schools were a project of the republic, and told hundreds of imam hatip graduate students that they crossed paths during his teaching at 6 universities different who never made such statements.
‘I SAID FROM MY UNIVERSITY PROFESSOR’
Claiming that his unfortunate words in the case were said 3 hours and 40 minutes after the show started, near the end of the show, Mütercimler stated that he misrepresented the words he designed on the show and caused misunderstandings.
BERAATINI REQUESTED
The translators stated the following in their defense:
“I said, ‘How are we going to handle this?’ After saying the words, there was no reaction from the other participants. If there was a reaction, I am an experienced programmer, I am an annual teacher, I would make my correction. I learned to use this sentence the next day at 11:00 with the warning of my assistant. I immediately sat down and wrote a press release containing my apology from the public, this was published on various websites, I was not satisfied with this, I repeat this apology in my own voice participating in the news on some televisions. Yes. I would have said on purpose, I would defend this idea to the end, no matter the cost.
They tried me in Ergenekon. There, my speeches were considered a crime. I defended this with my chest and was sentenced to 8 years and 9 months in prison. I have always defended my thoughts and thesis, but I do not defend my supposed statements in this case because I am not self-reflective. I definitely don’t have a meaning in that sentence. Again, I apologize to the people who mourn this prayer in your presence. I don’t think he committed a crime. Therefore, I demand my acquittal. “
