[ad_1]
CHP’s Fikri Sağlar participated in a TV show about veiled judges and prosecutors, “I doubt that when I go to the judge in a turban, I will stand up for justice. Some use it militantly and ideologically. This must be expressions of struggle. Sağlar, who made a statement on the reactions, argued that his thoughts were decontextualized and turned into a lynching campaign by being distorted, but while defending himself, he again resorted to separating and unpleasant language.
SCANDAL PRESENTED HIS WORDS
Sağlar used the following statements in the message he posted on his social media account:
“I am seeing with an example that my thoughts that I have expressed with integrity are trying to turn into a lynching campaign on social networks by being decontextualized and distorted. The turban is the uniform of reactionary activities, those that want the sharia. The headscarf is a traditional dress in Anatolia for centuries. There is a big difference between this. When I appear before a judge who wears a headscarf when they judge me, I doubt that he will protect my rights and do me justice. “ It is clear that my statements below are not directed at those who cover their heads because of their beliefs.
