[ad_1]
Okan Buruk, who gave a self-criticism to the editor, said: “As the head of this team, I claim the defeat. I am responsible for the big difference between the first and the second half. We were 2-0 behind with a simple goal that we ate from two foot balls, even with 10 people, we caught 3 to 2. The game in the second half is promising for us.
At the post-match press conference, Okan Buruk said: “Besiktas had a talented 11 no matter how short it was. Before the match, I said that both teams wanted to win and that luck was common. The first half was a first. half where no one would be happy. ” I speak.
Buruk said they bounced back in the second half, “Our opponent had a scoring opportunity at the end of the first half. A corner was scored, a goal was scored. The fixed ball return, we scored a goal and went back.” It was a second half. We went 3-2 with 10 people. I am satisfied with the wishes of the players. We reflected our spirit on the field in the second half. We couldn’t catch the score to change the game. I want to congratulate Beşiktaş and Sergen. I speak.
Buruk, who also evaluated the match referee, noted that there was no problem with Sergen Yalçın and said: “There was no discussion between us and Sergen’s teacher. The person I am very close to is Sergen’s teacher. Both sides. They were unhappy with the referee’s decisions. With the fourth official’s warning, the referee warned us both. When the referee was announced, I wondered why Ümit Öztürk was appointed for this match. Both parties were not happy with the management of the referee found the evaluation.
class = “cf”>
