[ad_1]
The detained defendant Burhan Dalğali, the complainant Ebubekir B. and the defendant’s lawyer attended the hearing at the 23rd High Criminal Court of Bakırköy.
According to AA reports, Seymen A, who was heard as a witness at the hearing, stated that they were relatives of the complainant and said: “Burhan Dalğali is a well-known professor at Esenler. I gave a loan of 700 to 800 lira to the complainant I didn’t send a message to Burhan. ” said.
The defendant Dalğali then claimed that the witness and the author were accomplices and that the witness made a false statement.
The defendant Dalğali said: “The problem is not 3,200 lire. These people conspired me, they blackmailed me. They asked for 300 thousand lire. They left the contact in the eyes of both my family and the nation. I feel bad when I see the face. from this man. I did not receive 3,200 lire. ” He spoke in the form.
In response to the defendant’s statements, Ebubekir B., the complainant, said: “It is slander, he is lying.” said. The prosecutor requested the continuation of the arrest of the accused.
The court board decided to release the accused Burhan Dalğali and postponed the hearing to hear the complainant and the witness at the next hearing.
Furthermore, it was learned that the defendant Burhan Dalğali was arrested in another case in which he was tried for “propaganda for a terrorist organization”.
WHAT HAPPENED?
In the indictment prepared by the Bakırköy Prosecutor General’s Office, it was stated that the complainant Ebubekir B had problems with his wife Semanur B.
The defendant who went to the house of the complainants said: “Such a marriage will not fall. You regret it. Your marriage has not fallen.” In the indictment, it was noted that the defendant received 1,600 lire from each of the complainants, 3,200 lire in total, in exchange for advice and suggestions.
Defendant Dalğali told Ebubekir B: “Do you have a separate room? We need to meet with your spouse alone.” The indictment claimed that the defendant Dalğali left the couple’s home after the complainants said they did not have separate rooms.
In the indictment, which stated that the defendant Dalğali used certain religious disguises to attribute credit, “fraud through the abuse of his religious beliefs and feelings” and “Opposition to the law on the block of dervishes lodges and mausoleums and the prohibition and abolition of certain titles “. 7 years and 3 months in prison are requested.
