[ad_1]
According to the report by Serdar Kulaksız of Habertürk, in the decision of the 15th Higher Criminal Court of Istanbul, it was assessed that the court in charge of ruling on the retrial and subsequent proceedings was the source of the violation decision of the Second Criminal Chamber of the Istanbul Regional Court of Appeals.
In the decision, it was stated that the Constitutional Court was considered the Second Criminal Chamber of the Istanbul Regional Court of Justice and it was decided that there was no room for a decision on the exception.
YOU CAN GO TO THE REGIONAL COURT OF JURISDICTION
15 In accordance with the decision of the Criminal Court, the Istanbul Regional Court of Appeals decided on the autonomy of the interested persons to present the file to the Second Criminal Chamber, request the file and submit a request to the Second Criminal Chamber of the Istanbul Regional Court of Justice for the decision of the Constitutional Court.
They objected
The Constitutional Court had issued a decision of “violation of rights” in relation to Enis Berberoğlu. The 14th Higher Criminal Court in Istanbul also decided that there is no room for a new trial, on the basis that the Constitutional Court’s decision “falls within the scope of suitability control”. Enis Berberoğlu’s lawyers appealed against the decision of the 14th Higher Criminal Court in Istanbul.
