[ad_1]
Pelosi held a press conference in Congress and made statements about the project, based on additional article 25 of the Constitution. Stating that she was concerned about whether Trump would be able to fully serve his presidency after the Kovid-19 test came back positive, Pelosi reacted to the White House by arguing that it was “not transparent on the matter.” Pelosi noted that the commission envisaged in the draft will work on this issue, “this draft is not something for Trump. It will face the judgment of the people on Election Day, but what happened shows that we need to create a process for future presidents. “. used expressions.
On the other hand, Pelosi argued that the bill had nothing to do with the November 3 presidential election, and claimed that its objective was to give the American people an assurance that the president’s ability is sufficient to maintain the stability of the State.
Additionally, Associate Constitutional Professor Jamie Raskin, who prepared the bill, also supported Pelosi, “The coronavirus epidemic showed us that a power plan is needed in case the president is unable to do his job.” He said.
Additional article 25 of the Constitution determines the actions to be taken if the President cannot continue in office, “The Vice President, the majority of the President’s cabinet or an organ of Congress may declare that the President cannot fulfill his duty.” Statement is included.
