[ad_1]
Consumer Protection Association (TÜKODER) President of Eskişehir Av. Murat Kalkan branch reacted to the fact that vehicle companies demand extra money reflecting the difference in excise tax on the consumer. Kalkan said: “One of our consumers buys a vehicle worth TL 2.5 million a few days before the SCT increase comes in. The SCT increase occurs before the vehicle reaches the company and is reported to the company that the vehicle will be delivered if the consumer pays a total of 812 thousand TL with the difference of 600 thousand TL. The selling company is responsible for the difference of SCT. “he said.
With the recently announced SCT regulation, SCT rates have increased on most vehicles. Some auto companies require extra money reflecting the SCT rate for the consumer. Many citizens who buy zero vehicles are concerned that companies reflect the difference in SCT.
“The company demanded 812 thousand lire”
Speaking on the matter, TÜKODER Eskişehir Branch President Av. Murat Kalkan said that 812 thousand lire was requested from a victim citizen who reached them. Chairman Kalkan said: “SCT rates on some vehicles have increased with SCT regulation in a recent period. With this increase, some companies have tried to reflect the difference in SCT to the consumer. I want to make the issue more concrete with reference to a consumer who requested our association. Our consumer is 2.5 million TL a few days before the SCT rise “. However, the company informs that the vehicle will not be in their hands within a few days and that the registration process will take place at that time.Before the vehicle arrives at the company, there is an increase in SCT and the company has a Total price difference of 212 thousand TL by the consumer. They are informed that if they pay 812 thousand lire they will be given the vehicle. “
“The vehicle sales contract is a type of double-sided contract that imposes debts on both sides”
Indicating what citizens who have been the subject of the SCT dispute issue should do, President Kalkan said: “Based on our example, what should our consumers apply to which authorities in these and similar situations? These issues. The vehicle sale contract is a type of bilateral contract that imposes debts on both parties. When the consumer pays the price of the vehicle in full and in full, the selling party must deliver the vehicle immediately, the party The seller, who does not comply with the obligation to transfer ownership of the vehicle, must bear the consequences of all the charges that will occur in this process.Therefore, in our concrete example, the selling company is responsible for the SCT difference. It is unfair and illegal as it violates the principle of commitment to the contract, which is known as the principle of commitment to the contract from the beginning. the consumption of the companies that resort to the court for the SCT rate increases by the Cabinet Decree. Our customers have been right and this decision sets a precedent for our already victimized consumers. Our consumers, in such a situation, must immediately inform the selling company that they do not accept their unfair demands by means of a warning, and that they will apply legal remedies against the company that acts against the contract in the event of buying the vehicle “.
[ad_2]
