[ad_1]
last minute “data-mce-href =” https://www.ntv.com.tr/son-dakika “> Latest news! Parliamentary spokesman Mustafa Şentop, on the new constitutional debates,” I have to work. A solution can be found, “he said.
Şentop answered the questions on the agenda on the Habertürk TV live broadcast.
Şentop said he received two separate letters from Palestinian officials stating that Palestinian prisoners and those detained in Israeli jails were not vaccinated in about two months and that he had consulted with President Recep Tayyip Erdogan and Foreign Ministry officials about this. topic.
Later, Şentop sent a letter to the Speaker of the Israeli Parliament (Knesset), Yariv Levin, in which he stated that the vaccination of Palestinian prisoners and detainees in Israeli jails is a humanitarian issue.
“THE NEW CONSTITUTIONAL DEBATE MUST BE TAKEN SERIOUSLY”
Şentop said that there should be an intention to make a new constitution, “it is necessary to concentrate on the agreed points and try to act on them. A solution can be found.”
Stating that political parties’ predictions about the constitution can be understood when concretely embodied in articles, Şentop said: “During the Constitutional Reconciliation Commission process that began in 2011, we actually produced texts that reveal what type of constitution they are. all political parties In other words, a complete constitutional text appeared as the suggestions of all political parties. I believe that the debate on the new constitution should be taken seriously. Results will happen, not results. Getting a result should be a goal honestly, but a concrete text must emerge, “he said.
Şentop emphasized that it did not accept the claim that the Presidential System of Government and Parliament were disabled, and said:
“In the presidential system of government, the structure of parliament and the relationship of the executive, that is, the political party of which the president is a member, is not the only option. In the parliamentary system, the citizen has a single vote. This single vote, you are asked to determine both the executive and the parliament. More precisely, you determine the parliament with a single vote. The government leaves it. However, in the new system, the citizen has two right votes, the right to elect the government by a separate vote, and to determine the parliament by another vote. Therefore, in this system, the citizen elects the president of a political party and the political party of which the president is a member is the majority in the parliament. Gives the vote to the president, and in parliament he cannot vote for his party. In such a case, a different majority structure may emerge in parliament. In this case, an opportunity to work completely independently Before the executive, in the previous system there was no such option. There is a legislative process under the control of the executive and the government. No choice. “
Responding to the criticism of some deputies that the parliamentary questions were not answered, Şentop pointed out that the response rate of the questions in the 27th Legislative Period, when the Presidential System of Government began, was higher than all previous legislatures.
“THE PARLIAMENTARY PHASE IS ONLY A PERMISSION PHASE”
Turkey’s decision to withdraw from the Istanbul Convention Şentop with the criticism of the Speaker of Parliament regarding the disabled, in accordance with the Constitution, the adoption of an international convention and applicability; He stated that there are three steps: “signature”, “approval approval” and “approval”.
Stating that parliament approves an agreement signed by law, Şentop said:
“Then the president’s approval phase begins. It goes into effect after the president approves it. The approval of the Assembly by law means: ‘There is no problem in ratifying this. This agreement can be ratified. ‘ Speaking more technically, it gives permission to ratify. But for example, the president may not approve or approve. You can withdraw your consent after approving. The parliamentary phase is only an authorization phase. It is not a phase that requires ratification. It is not new, but the Celebration of Certain Treaties No. 244 of 1963. There is an Authorization Law of the President of the Republic, that is, it has been this way since 1963. There are dozens of examples, this is the legislation and application. “
Who regretted the withdrawal of the Istanbul Convention on Turkey, but also those who annoy “It is a long time that I should resign” from those who also stated that Şentop, drew attention to the regulations issued on the fight against violence against women in Turkey . Şentop, “I have found a reference that I made to the courts and the administration of the application of the Istanbul Convention agent. Perhaps some. In Turkey, the Protection of the Family and the Law of Prevention of Violence against Women. Force of this law. She is making the application based on the law, the administration and the courts. The fact that the contract has been canceled does not repeal that law, “he said.
Şentop, who was asked what his position was in the debate about leaving the contract or staying, said:
“It is not convenient for me to make a final assessment. Everyone sees the issue from the sociological community in which they are. They look at the issue feeding on the sources of information from which the community draws. There were also those who were opposite; one side did not see them. Others do not see those who are sensitive about something. Protect the family and prevent violence against women. Some minor deficiencies are mentioned in the Law of Concern, and I agree with some of them. These are completed, I think this law will suffice in this fight. There is an inquiry commission on violence against women established in Parliament on March 9. I am of the opinion that if there are legal deficiencies, it will lead to procedures to complete them, if there are implementation deficiencies , to remedy them. Statements have been made on this issue expressing determination in the fight against violence against women, especially our President. These will be followed by the citizenship. the violence will increase completely. ‘ It is not suitable so much for the international reality as for the statistical information “.
Mustafa Şentop stated that some expressions and concepts in the convention cause discomfort and some demands arise on them, “especially the approaches within the LGBTI framework … There are some legal and human rights paradigms centered in Western Europe. Some of these are universal. And also in Western Europe. “There are some approaches and understandings of human rights that belong to it. He tries to make them accepted as if they were universal things, “he said.
THE CASE RELATING TO THE CLOSURE OF THE HDP
Evaluating the arguments that the HDP’s Ömer Faruk Gergerlioğlu’s verdict was read in the General Assembly of the Grand National Assembly of Turkey without waiting for the Constitutional Court process, Şentop said: “There is not a single example that has reached Parliament as a ‘final sentence’ before the 27th legislature and was kept pending until the end of the legislature. “The final verdict of that deputy was upheld in parliament.” No. The final provisions were read. Read because the General Assembly was not in the meeting and the election decision was made. In one case, it was waited because there was a regulation of law, “he said.
Located in hdp’n the closing of the evaluation of the claims presented before Şentop, as a principle of the political leaders in Turkey has indicated that it will not favor the closing of a political party.
Şentop stated that politics is a peaceful form of struggle that is preferred to express the problems of the country and the problems of society.
There are also structures that see terrorism as legitimate after certain accusations, ideologies, if necessary, engage in terrorist activities, kill people and try to achieve certain goals by way and method in this way. These are the structures that we call terrorist organizations. This is a completely different way. If he joins and begins to have a relationship, if politics, which is a completely peaceful way, begins to act in relation to a structure that tries to achieve its objectives through terrorism, to a greater or lesser extent. , financially, in terms of decision-making mechanisms, so what shall we say? “In principle, the games should not be turned off.” So here there is also a problem. There is no middle way. If an image emerges on this subject, no doubt the actions of the people are important in terms of the personality of the crime, but the actions of these people become such that they are now the actions of the legal person. If a point is reached that can be described, then there is a case of closure. From here, there is a lawsuit filed by the Attorney General of the Supreme Court of Appeals and finally a decision of the Constitutional Court. Political parties should not be closed, but if there is a political party that is intertwined with a terrorist organization, the Constitutional Court. If it detects this, it certainly will. “
“ZERO POSSIBLE EARLY CHOICE”
Şentop, “Do you see the possibility of an election ahead of time?” “I give zero chances.” answered.
Stating that anticipated electoral debates are one of the topics that are discussed on the concepts of the old system and the current one, Şentop continued as follows:
“In the past it was very easy to make decisions for early elections. A qualified number was not sought in the Assembly. When a decision quorum was achieved, electoral decisions could be made. Now it is not. Now, a qualified number is sought. in Parliament to make an early electoral decision. Here we established a balanced system. If Parliament makes an electoral decision, the election of the President is also renewed. When the President decides on the election, the President has shortened his own term. Early Elections contrary to the logic of this system. Why is there in the Constitution? If there is a very serious crisis, politics is an arrangement that is thought to be an open door when you enter a dead end. In the past, there was never any elections held on time. There are no early elections in this system. So let me express the legal difficulty of this, it doesn’t make much political logic. “
