[ad_1]
While the detained defendant Abdullah Uçmak was brought to the hearing held at the 3rd Higher Criminal Court of Istanbul, the other defendants attended the hearing with the Audio and Video Information System (SEGBİS).
According to the DHA report, attorneys for the parties were also present at the hearing. The prosecutor reiterated his opinion issued at the previous hearing and demanded the punishment of the accused. Defendant Abdullah Uçmak, against the defense of the author’s lawyer Ahmet Küçük, said: “The lawyer spoke rudely, exceeding his limits. He did not intervene. I do not want to intervene in his presence,” he said.
Abdullah Uçmak, one of the accused
Faced with these words of the accused, the author’s lawyer, Ahmet Küçük, reacted by saying “How are you talking?” Faced with the tension, the president of the court removed Abdullah Uçmak and his lawyers from the room.
“THERE IS REALLY NO AGAINST CUSTOMERS”
Later, Abdullah Uçmak was brought into the courtroom for his defense. Flying “, the prosecutor copied and pasted the accusation of the previous prosecutor. It is evident from the pictures that the original target (İbrahim Tatlıses) may have been injured by the fragments of the bullet from the head. There is no intentional act against the complaints. They’d shoot them both if they wanted to. “And the bullet goes in through the left window. There is no bullet that reaches the driver’s location or anywhere else. This file is a terrible file from the start. I have nothing more to say, “he said.
LAWYER REQUESTED YOUR BERAAT
Defendant Abdullah Uçmak’s lawyer said they disagreed with the opinion and said: “It is said that my client convinced Yunus Ayık to be a driver, but it is known from the beginning that there was no such thing. If the defendants had The intention to kill, first they would have killed the driver, who demanded the acquittal of Uçmak, speaking as “I want to”.
ABDULLAH FLY AND TOTAL 30 YEARS FOR 2 SECONDS
The court sentenced the defendant Abdullah Uçmak to 30 years in prison against the complainants Buket Çakıcı and Hakan Çalışkan for “attempting to kill by deliberate deliberation”, each for 15 years. The defendants Ersin Altun and Yunus Ayık were sentenced to a total of 30 years in prison, each of 15 years, against the complainants Buket Çakıcı and Hakan Çalışkan for “deliberately attempting to kill”. The defendant Emin Birdal was sentenced to 7 years, 3 months and 15 days in prison and a judicial fine of TL 2,500 for the crime of “supplying arms”.
CASE BACKGROUND
When İbrahim Tatlıses left the shooting program in which he participated, his assistant Buket Çakıcı and driver Hakan Çalışkan were attacked on March 14, 2011 with an armed attack. In the incident in which İbrahim Tatlıses and Buket Çalışkan were injured, the driver Hakan Çalışkan was unharmed. At the trial at the 17th Higher Criminal Court in Istanbul, the defendant Abdullah Uçmak was sentenced to a total of 7 years and 6 months in prison for “establishing and managing an armed organization”, “Threat”. The defendant Uçmak was sentenced to 18 years in prison for “attempted murder with qualified intent” against İbrahim Tatlıses and to 7 years in prison for “violating the arms law”. Uçmak was also sentenced to 4 years in prison for the crime of “deliberate injury” against Buket Çakıcı and was sentenced to 36 years and 6 months in total. The Ninth Criminal Chamber of the Supreme Court of Appeals confirmed the prison sentences imposed on the defendant Abdullah Uçmak for “establishing and managing an armed organization for the purpose of committing a crime”, “Deliberately attempting to kill”, “Qualifying threat” and “Opposition to the law of arms “. The sentence handed down by the Supreme Court for the crime of “supplying arms” of the defendants Emin Birdal, with the actions of Abdullah Uçmak, Ersin Altun and Yunus Ayık, who were convicted of the crime of “deliberate injury” against the Hakan complainants Çalışkan and Buket Çakıcı.
