[ad_1]
Our writer Deniz Çoban commented on the critical positions on the beIN Sports screens after the Galatasaray-Antalyaspor match. Deniz Çoban commented on the positions where Emre Kılınç received a red card and Marcao received a yellow card.
“Marcao committed a clear foot violation in the first half, he should have received a yellow card. Belhanda’s play was ‘unsportsmanlike’ and he should have received a yellow card again.
“I don’t know why Atilla Karaoğlan is the VAR referee for this match. He has not been able to win a match for four weeks. In such a critical match, I was unable to assign a depressed referee.”
‘Emre Kılınç’s action should have been a yellow card’
“What are the criteria for the red card? First, what is the possibility of playing the ball? Two, is the foot bent from the knee? Three, is the crampon bolts showing the opponent? Four, the opponent Does he have a chance to defend himself? Finally, where is the point of contact? The first four criteria are with a red card. ” There is a problem only with the point of contact. I think the move doesn’t feel hurtful. This action should have been a yellow card in my opinion. But the VAR should not have been involved in it. It is not a position to never interfere. The red card meets most of the criteria. “
‘Marcao’s movement …’
“The play that Marcao made in the second half is more brutal than the other. This is a play that pushes the limits, but it is on the edge. It would be more correct in my opinion if he showed a red card, but in my opinion the VAR should have interfered with that, if it was mixed with the first red card. There was no standard in the same match. “
[ad_2]
