[ad_1]
Yağız Tuzla (26), who put his car up for sale in Balıkesir, disagreed with the Adana buyers. Two months later, Yağız Tuzlan’s car was confiscated for execution due to a loan of TL 58,750. Tuzla said they started a legal process to claim their rights through their lawyer Oğuzhan Tukız: “They came from Adana to buy my car. We could not agree when they said they wanted to buy it with an invoice. Following the application of the enforcement procedures Made by these people without a verdict, a notification was sent to an address in Adana, where I have never visited in my life. “I realized they were scammers when my car was connected,” he said.
Yağız Tuzla, who lives in Balıkesir, put his car on the market in October. When he could not agree with 5 people who came to Balıkesir from Adana, Tuzla stopped selling his vehicle. Tuzla, who entered the police ring in December, learned that his vehicle was impounded as a result of prosecution by the Adana Enforcement Office. The people who came to collect the car went to the Adana Enforcement Office on October 22 and claimed that they gave a loan of TL 58,750 by hand to Yavuz Tuzla. The Enforcement Office sent a notice of enforcement proceedings without sentence to 3 different addresses in Adana on behalf of Yağız Tuzla, with the statement of these people. The people at the two addresses did not accept the notification, saying they did not know Yağız Tuzla and that there was no such person at the address. However, MO at the third address accepted the notice sent on behalf of Yağız Tuzla, stating that he was a relative and was not at home at the time. When Yağız Tuzla did not appeal within 7 days, which is the legal deadline, because he was not aware of the notice, a foreclosure was imposed and his car was tied up. The connected car was stopped in the trustee’s parking lot.
‘IN ADANA, WHICH I HAVE NEVER PASSED A DEDICATION HAS BEEN MADE TO 3 SEPARATE DIRECTIONS’
Yağız Tuzla said: “They came from Adana to buy my car. The car had a 6,000 TL traffic fine debt, they paid it. Later, we could not agree when they said they wanted to buy the car with a bill. We returned 6,000 TL. TL and back to Adana. I don’t know these people. “I have been disappointed by people who notified on my behalf at 3 different addresses in Adana, where I have never been in my life. I want everyone involved in this business to be caught and sentenced and others not to be victims. “
NOTIFICATION HAS BEEN ACCEPTED BY SAYING ‘MY UNCLE’S SON, MY AUNT SON’
Tuzlan’s lawyer, Oğuzhan Tukız, provided the following information about the process:
My client enters the police dial while traveling in Balıkesir in his own vehicle. You learn that there is a lien on the vehicle and that the vehicle is connected. When my client, unaware of the incident, asked the police what happened, it is said that he was given a deprivation decision at the Adana Enforcement Office. Later, when we checked in UYAP, we found out that an execution proceeding was started against Yağız Tuzla and a friend. When we examined the notifications, notices were sent to 3 different addresses that he did not know in Adana, where he never went. The first notification is sent to the Seyhan District on November 3. The notification is sent to the Sarıçam district on November 7. Notifications in 2 districts are returned because there is no recipient. Finally, he was maliciously denounced on November 19. MO at the last address accepts notifications in an abusive way. While one of my clients says that his aunt is my son and for my other client, she accepts the notifications saying “Uncle son, they are already in the market”. A notification is sent to an address where my client has not been in his life for a second. Although my two clients are just friends and stay in different residences in Balıkesir, notifications are sent to the same addresses at the same time in Adana. Notifications do not go to the addresses of the Central Population Administration System (MERNIS). MERNİS addresses are also in Balıkesir. 7 days after the notification is accepted, a general attachment request is made by addressing the enforcement office. At the moment, the vehicle is being held in the trustee’s parking lot and is going against my client every second. It is obvious that the follow-up was so maliciously intentional that it began on October 22, in the request made on October 22, a complaint was made saying that I lent money in hand. We also complained about the officer’s transaction at the Adana Execution Court. We also object to debt and authority in the Office of Enforcement. Finally, we will also file a criminal complaint against people who add the non-existent debt to the enforcement system, deliberately issue a notification to the wrong address, take away the right of recourse to the citizen and inflict material and moral damage on them.
