[ad_1]
Regarding the allegations of harassment at the Ege University School of Dentistry, the students addressed the prosecutor saying “We lost hope for the school” and claimed that the incident was covered up. Hürriyet has come to the reports prepared by the commissions established within the school on the accusations of the students. According to the investigation file, the students first went to the dean’s office on December 14, 2019, stating that they were harassed. The Dean’s Office established the ‘Preliminary Investigation Commission’ on December 16. The commission, made up of three professors, completed its preliminary report on January 3, 2020.
‘HOCA HEP PROMOTION AND THANKS ‘
In the evaluation part of this first report, the following assessment was made for the teacher accused of harassment: “He is a recognized teacher who carries out his teaching activity with great seriousness and devotion. It is known that during all these years, he has not received the slightest accusation or denunciation of sexual abuse or insults, but thanks and praise. The last proof of this characteristic is that the students of the last semester rewarded him while he was the coordinator of the fifth grade multidisciplinary clinic. Prof. Dr. They also stated that the accusations attributed to ZEB by the last group of students were made in front of everyone, and it was understood that they did not occur in a secluded room or corner ”.
Hürriyet made headlines for his accusations at the university on September 27.
class = “cf”>
THESE ARE REASONABLE MOVED
Following this report, an inquiry commission made up of three professors was established. The commission examined the allegations in the statements of the students and the defenses of the accused professor. Some of the allegations in the report dated May 5, 2020 and the commission’s evaluations are as follows:
Complain: “He grabbed me by the shoulders, pulled me back. He patted me on the waist and said ‘Come on, go ahead’ and left. “
class = “cf”>
Report: “The student witness confirmed the contact but stated that he did not hear the speech. We have come to the conclusion that there was no sexual intention in the act, that bodily immunity was not violated, that the situation was a reasonable act of life, and in this case it was concluded that there was no crime of sexual harassment. “
Complain: “As I was looking at the patient, she came up behind me and pushed my hair back, leaned into my ear and said, ‘Should you put on the sexy woman? So I turned around in a panic. I looked who it was. I saw you were a ZEB teacher. “
Report: “It was loud, the conversations were made at close range, with no evidence.”
Complain: “While I was working in the clinic, a hand suddenly touched my shoulder. The same hand touched my body and reached my waist. It attracted me. I turned around and realized it was a ZEB teacher. “
Report: “The witness did not listen to the speeches of the students because the environment was noisy, there is no evidence.”
‘NO HARASSMENT, CONFUSED ‘
Complain: “A patient of mine sent me a text message on WhatsApp at night. I expressed my discomfort to the ZEB professor. He said, ‘Wouldn’t you have liked it? I like you a lot’.
Report: “The compliment should not be considered sexual harassment. This is a social and civilized behavior and it cannot be said that sexual freedom is violated. It is clear from the ZEB statement that he addressed the issue with humorous language in the community without being offensive to ensure discipline ”.
Complain: “I felt that the ZEB master had a palpable contact with my palm, starting from my right shoulder to the left hip area. With a start, I turned around. The teacher came up to me and said ‘Good morning’. My friend HG reacted by saying that he saw it in the mirror and said: ‘He touched you, what’s going on’.
class = “cf”>
Report: “Although HG confirmed the incident, there is a need to prove the crime precisely because of the magnitude of the criminal charge against sexual assault, and the witness claimed that he did not see the situation directly from the mirror and that no other witnesses were found.”
HYGIENE AND ORDER TO ENSURE’
Complain: “My hair was obvious because it was a little wet. A person behind me began to remove my sweater from behind, with their hands touching my body. I am in shock. I turned around and saw that he was a teacher. He said, ‘Show me some of the attention you pay to your hair.
Report: In its defense, ZEB made a statement that to guarantee hygiene and order, students must work in white coats, they must remove the clothes they are wearing inside or on, and in this case, it was concluded that the complainant was He removed the shirt because it was prohibited in terms of hygiene and did not comply with the clinical standard.
AND CONCLUSION: NO NEED TO INVESTIGATE
In the concluding part of the report, two of the three professors who made up the commission made the following assessment: “It has been observed that the ZEB’s behaviors to maintain order in the operation of the clinic sometimes exceeded its purpose and did not reach the goal. threat level, but it was noted that the action was an act that required disciplinary investigation and was not a crime under the TCK. that it is not necessary to do so … ”Commissioner Prof. Dr. MCA, on the other hand, referred to each of his students separately and stated that he is of the opinion that these acts constitute crimes of ‘sexual harassment’ and ‘insult’ according to TCK. The MCA stated that people who were not called to the commission as witnesses despite their names should also be called and heard as witnesses.
