Should we believe and trust? – Sözcü newspaper



[ad_1]

The economy of Turkey, “Introverts, the tension is at the highest level, the sense of justice is damaged, an attempt is made to contain the opposition through judicial decisions” Finally, the government understood that it would not improve in an environment.

“Reform”, “democracy”, “human rights” Even words like getting out of the authorities allowed the Turkish lira to gain 10 percent in five days.

Now let’s take a look at those statements, developments, and the situation in the field:

1) President Tayyip Erdoğan, Minister of Finance and Finance The weight of AlbayrakAfter accepting his resignation, he quickly made the appointment and gave messages of reform. Erdogan made the following sentences:

“In the coming months, we will take further steps towards a predictable and easily accessible judicial system. We are in structural reforms. Our country has investment law standards. We will prepare our country for the new era by quickly realizing the needs that will arise with the consultations of all representatives of the economy with the parts of our legal system. We will develop the investment climate in a positive way. “

The weight of AlbayrakThe resignation of the United States started the fall of the dollar, but ErdoganThese words of the Turkish lira allowed the appreciation of the Turkish lira to be more stable.

2) Persecution Minister of Justice Abdulhamit Gul he said:

“This is what we expect from judges and judicial members, for justice to be done or the end of the world. ‘What does it say, what does it say, suggested the person who came to court, how it looks, how it evaluates, is appropriate for the situation.’ Friend, the judiciary does not look at the situation, the judiciary does not look at memories, the judiciary does not look at what someone says. The judiciary examines the record, the conscience, the law and the constitution. This is our expectation. Therefore, justice is done, whatever happens, the HSK is there, this nation is with the members of the Judiciary. Decide according to your conscience, not by looking at anyone’s advice, instructions or suggestions, but by looking at the file and let you look ahead with 83 million quiet people. We will continue to stand firmly on the side of all judges and prosecutors and the justice system on this issue. “

Stop listening, people clap even while reading. When your judges make their decision “How does that look like?”, “Who suggested how”, “Is it suitable for the conjuncture?” It’s a great indicator of self-confidence that a name at this level expresses that you have to think in details like. To members of the judiciary “The judiciary does not look at what someone says”Could a clearer warning be made than?

3) Minister roseImmediately after his speech, another detail emerged. Council of Judges and Prosecutors, Osman kavalaHe requested a list of the members of the Judiciary who signed the decisions on him.

Inevitable, “The main decision on the principles of evaluating the work of judges and prosecutors of the first and first class”Article 7 of “J” bendi says:

“Based on the principles of judicial independence and security of the judges; In the examinations carried out by the European Court of Human Rights and the Constitutional Court, it is decided whether they are worthy of promotion or not, considering the nature and gravity of the violation they caused, and the efforts of the interested parties to protect the guaranteed rights. by the European Convention on Human Rights and the Constitution “.

So he says that when members of the judiciary are promoted AİHM Y Constitutional court They will also be evaluated according to whether or not they made the right decision. To put it more clearly AİHMIn or Constitutional courtin “breach” Those who consider themselves as will not be able to ascend.

★★★

Now President Y Justice ministerexplanations of and HSKLooking at the step taken by, we can easily say the following: “From now on, no judge will decide based on his political opinion and that of the accused!”

Can we really tell?

If only we could say it!

I wish HSK, AYM’s Enis Berberoğlu for those serving at the 14th and 15th Superior Criminal Court of Istanbul, who do not recognize their decision, if they can apply article 7, paragraph j of the main decision

If only, SPOKESMAN if, RoomTV if, Canan Kaftancioglu if, Osman kavala if, Ayhan bilgenJudges who signed the ECHR case and other decisions of the Constitutional Court, “If we leave these, what will the government say?” or “If I keep it in jail, I will be a prey to the government” if they didn’t say, if they didn’t say!

Although the statements made give hope, we have been so burned by what happened that they even blow our milk. Words are not enough, we are waiting for action.

What do you say, under these circumstances, should we believe and trust those statements?



[ad_2]