Prof. Dr. Ceyhan: It is not correct to control fire.

Hacettepe Prof. Dr. Mehmet Ceyhan was the guest of the Habertürk headline newsletter.

Here, presenter Mehmet Akif Ersoy, who made assessments on the coronavirus outbreak. Ceyhan Noting that the fire measures applied at the accesses to almost all places are unnecessary, he stated that this creates a risk contrary to what was thought.

According to the news from Sputnik Turkey; Stating that less than 10 percent of coronavirus patients had a high fever, Ceyhan said: “Now, the biggest problem here is this … This pandemic started in China. When it started, the Chinese released more data than they had. “. Unfortunately, the wrong results of your posts still affect a few things. For example, this is one. It was first said that fever is seen in 70 percent of corona patients. However, it was 70 percent of those who had symptoms. You see fire in less than 2. Look, actually, the biggest reason why it’s unnecessary is that you’re going somewhere, you line up at the door, you have to go to the door. This has a higher risk. We do not recommend that you measure the fire. Few people have a fever and that does not mean they have a coronavirus. There may be a fever for other reasons. Respiratory infections have increased because we have entered the fall. It also unnecessarily isolates those whose fever is rising. It is not correct to control the fire in the entrances. “There is no measurable damage with thermal cameras, but waiting is extremely risky,” he said.

The highlights of Ceyhan’s statements are as follows:

‘Reduced mask of coronavirus’

• ‘Yes, the reduced coronavirus mask. When we look at the world, there is a huge upward trend. In the period that we call the ‘biggest problem’ of the epidemic, that is, at the end of March and the beginning of April, the number of daily cases in the world is 50 thousand, while more than 350 thousand cases are reported per day . The virus is as deadly as before. The rate is low, but the number of deaths in the world is increasing from 5 to 6 thousand a day.
• It’s actually the same as the second figures, except for the short term in April. What makes the difference right now; Now the number of tests in the world has increased 10 to 20 times compared to the first times. Since the test is mostly done on people without symptoms, its death rate is very low. Therefore, the rate has dropped. There were no changes to the virus.
• For example, if you are looking in a country with great testing opportunities, death rates like Kuwait and Qatar are much lower. If the number of tests in a country is not greater than the population, the mortality rate is higher.

Were curfews unnecessary?

• Currently, the virus situation is more than fact. At the time, precautions such as curfew were taken around the world, especially since it was not known how long it would take and how it would be addressed. The number of cases began to decline, economic conditions began to tighten.
• On the other hand, the wrong predictions of the scientists arose. There were accusations that it will decrease in the summer. Suddenly the restrictions were lifted. At the end of this, we saw that the countries that lifted the measures began to experience the second period of increase without exception. For example, it increased to 26,000 in France, 12-13,000 in Spain, and 5-6,000 in Belgium. Russia started this business after us, but when it dropped from 9,000 to 6,000, it suddenly rose to 13,000. Because the virus did not move away from society, the numbers increased when you slightly distorted the distance while waiting in society and when you did not wear a mask. The average age of the cases has decreased, the old group stayed away from the virus. Death rates fell as the younger groups began to get sick.

You can rate this news 0 0