[ad_1]
In the incident that occurred on July 16; The suspect, who claimed that he had continued the same action several more times despite hitting Gültekin and falling to the ground, confessed that he saw blood flow from his head, and after strangling Gültekin with his hands, he shoved his lifeless body into a barrel and burned it with gasoline. As a result of the investigation carried out by the Muğla Prosecutor General’s Office, a charge was brought against Cemal Metin Avcı for “murder by writing with monstrous sentiment or suffering”. In the indictment, Mertcan Avcı, the suspect’s brother, was also asked to be punished for allegedly trying to cover up the crime committed by his brother.
FREEZING BLOOD MURDER CLAIM IS READY
The Sıddık-Şefika Gültekin couple, whose daughter was unable to reach Pınar, filed a disappearance complaint on 18 July. The defendant Cemal Metin Avcı; In his first statement he denied the accusation, saying he knew nothing, but later confessed the truth. The suspect, who made a statement at the Akyaka Gendarmerie Station; He said that he took Pınar, which he bought in front of Rüya Park AVM, to the vineyard house in the Karabağlar region and beat him in the argument between them, and then after burning him in the iron barrel that he had drowned, he closed the mouth of the barrel pouring ‘kalekim’. An investigation was launched in the region after the suspect said he threw the barrel, which became heavier after the goal, into the bushes in the Gülağzı region.
The corpse, which was taken to the Muğla Institute of Forensic Medicine and completely burned, was found in the fetal position as a result of removal of the barrel with the help of an electric coil.
THE ROPE WAS PACKAGED FOR TIMES
As a result of the investigations, it was learned that the suspect, who was arrested on July 21, strangled Gültekin by putting the seventh knot between his teeth with the rope that was wrapped around his neck on 6 occasions. The suspect, Cemal Metin Avcı, said that he and Pınar went to his grandfather’s vineyard house in the Karabağlar region and that the deceased started screaming during the discussion.
PINAR SIM CARD INCLUDED
It was said that Avcı, who is married with a child, struck the deceased by throwing a punch to the ground a few more times and that Gültekin, who had blood from his head, squeezed his throat and checked if he was breathing. The offender, who claimed to have wrapped the body with a rope to put it in the barrel, said that he first tried to burn the barrel with firewood at home, but decided to burn it outside due to the increase in smoke. He said that while he was going to buy gasoline to burn the body, he took the deceased’s SIM card, separated it from the place and threw it out the window. Avcı stated that after changing his clothes and taking gasoline, he returned to the scene and burned the body with gasoline by throwing pieces of wood into the barrel. The suspect, who claimed his right foot was under the barrel, which became heavy as a result of pouring ‘kalekim’ to cover the muzzle, added that he regretted it. On the day of the incident it was determined that he bought 3 liters of gasoline with his vehicle, and it was reflected in the images.
Claiming that he had planned the incident alone, the suspect said he cleaned up the blood traces when the barrel burned. The fact that no trace remained of a phone and a knife, which he said he had thrown into the barrel and burned it, invalidated the suspect’s allegations, and the wound on his hand was determined not to be a cut. Furthermore, there was no evidence that the deceased, whose mobile phone was examined, sent a message or image as claimed by the suspect.
FATHER COMMITTED A CRIME, HELPED SISTER
Although he said he committed the murder alone, it was alleged that Mertcan Avcı, the deceased’s brother, also helped the suspect blacken the evidence. In Hunter’s testimony against which the indictment was prepared on charges of “destroying, concealing or changing criminal evidence”; Notably, his brother said he ‘burned the spoiled kokorec’ and did not look at the keg because it was late even though he was there when he went to the warehouse.
The spouse of the suspect whose statement is forwarded; He said he had no information about the incident. She said the suspect was busy both because he ran the store called Cüce and his father’s workplace called Güven Motor, and that she did not feel any strangeness in her husband’s behavior.
Pinar’s friend Burcu Özdemir Ünsal, who was heard as a witness, testified that he saw Pinar for the last time the day before she was killed and that no one, including herself, was able to reach Pinar on the day of the incident. Burcu Özdemir Ünsal stated that he called the suspect Cemal Metin Avcı on the day of the incident and asked Pınar, but said that Avcı had no information.
In the indictment drawn up as a result of the prosecutor’s investigation; Focusing on the theory that there is a relationship between the deceased and the suspect, it was claimed that Avcı, who feared the emergence of the relationship, planned and killed Gültekin. It was revealed that Pınar and Cemal Metin met in the Rüya Park AVM area, that Avcı took Pınar to the vineyard house on the Karabağlar plateau, where he hit Gültekin, after falling to the ground, he squeezed his throat with his hands. hands and tied a knot around her neck many times. While the exact cause of the deceased’s death could not be determined in the Forensic Medicine Report, the emphasis was on tightening his throat or burning his body entirely. There is no evidence that the deceased attacked Avcı with a knife as claimed by the suspect. This detail nullified Avcı’s statement that “Pınar attacked me with a knife, I hit myself to protect myself.”
Sonay Koç / Sabah
Breaking news: New events emerged in the murder of Pınar Gültekin! “This can’t be a coincidence …”
Breaking minute: Pınar Gültekin murder suspect’s divorce case was spotted! Eda Avcı divorces his murderous wife Cemal Metin Avcı
[ad_2]
