Last minute! He was killing the doctor in Maçka Park! Surprised in court! News



[ad_1]

In the incident that took place in Istanbul Şişli Maçka Democracy Park on June 11, the psychiatric assistant Süleyman Dönmezler, who was walking with two companions, had an argument with the defendant Emrah Danisman over the subject of speech. The suspect Consultant, who broke the bottle in his hand, cut Dönmez’s neck. The defendant, who escaped after the incident, was captured by police teams.

The defendant is Emrah Advisor, who injured Süleyman Dönmezler with the bottle he broke.

PENALTY OF UP TO 15 YEARS REQUESTED

According to the news in İHA, the accused appeared before the judge, who was detained by the judge where he was released and who was sued for up to 15 years in prison. Defendant Emrah Counsel and lawyers for the parties attended the hearing at the 38th Superior Criminal Court in Istanbul.

“I DID NOT INTEND TO KILL”

The trial began with identification. The defendant, who said he was a high school graduate, said that he was a shoemaker and his monthly income was 6 to 7,000. The defendant, who made his defense at the hearing, said: “On the day of the incident, I bought vodka and went to Maçka Park because of my family problems. I drank alcohol. Then, as I was walking home, I heard the complainant call me ‘bloated’.

“SHISH!

Then he said words like ‘I cry for your mother, dishonest, stalker’. He attacked me from behind. To defend myself and scare myself, I broke the bottle of vodka in my hand and waved it at the complainant. He had no intention of killing. After the incident, I told the ISPARK officers that Süleyman Dönmezler was injured and that they should call an ambulance while I was on foot and headed home. I’m very sorry and I regret it. I apologize to him and his family. “

REPORT OF INJURIES REQUESTED TO FORENSIC MEDICINE

When expressing its opinion at the hearing, the Public Ministry demanded that a report be obtained from the Institute of Forensic Medicine on whether the injury posed a life-threatening situation and that the arrest of the accused would continue. The court board decided to obtain a report from the Institute of Forensic Medicine on the continuation of the defendant’s detention and whether the injury would cause death, and postponed the hearing.

[ad_2]