[ad_1]
MHP President Devlet Bahçeli emphasized that the Constitutional Court must be restructured, saying: “In this context, the Constitutional Court must be restructured according to the nature of the new system of government.”
MHP leader Bahçeli made a written statement and used the following statements:
“The Grand National Assembly of Turkey will begin the 4th Legislative Year of the 27th Mandate, on October 1, 2020, at a time when there are heated debates and an atmosphere of tension that it finds mediocre in the environment of our country. authority.
The further democratization of Turkey, further development of the region and the global system to be more effective in the historical strength of Parliament on the one hand, the other side also depends on the characteristic of the presidential government system is active. Today, our country faces a hostility front that is constantly arbitrated and replenished.
“DEMOCRATIC CONTENT MUST BE REFERRED”
In addition to establishing solid principles of our national security, the main agenda should be the establishment of the Presidential Government System with all its institutions and rules, so that the climate of peace and stability takes root. For this, the new system of government must clean itself of all the humps, all the ties and all the obstacles of the Parliamentary System. Ultimately, the dominated judicial and legal system must be addressed, and the judicial institutions that are the product and legacy of the coup periods must have a democratic content.
Especially in countries governed by the Presidential System, there are “Supreme Court” or “Supreme Courts” as the highest organ of the judiciary. On the other hand, there are Constitutional Courts in countries governed by the Parliamentary System. However, a historic administrative reform was carried out in our country, the beloved Turkish nation, the sole owner of sovereignty, preferred the Presidential System of Government on April 16, 2017, and the period of the Parliamentary System ended. The colossal problems that threaten our national survival receive a more effective response through the Presidential System of Government. Anti-democratic initiatives are blocked by this system of government.
“MUST BE RESTORED”
Successes in fighting terrorism, cross-border operations and protecting our sovereign rights have become faster and more effective thanks to the Presidential System of Government. Resistance to economic attacks, the determined fight against the Kovid-19 epidemic has reached the desired levels with the solid management and administration offered by the new system of government. Now it is an unavoidable need to restructure the institutions formed by the Parliamentary System and transfer them to a functional point of support for the Presidential Government System. The establishment of the Presidential Government System, which is based on the principles of democracy and the will of our beloved nation, must be fundamental, from the moldy shackles of the institutions that emerged after the coups d’état. One of them is the Constitutional Court, which first entered our law with the 1961 Constitution and was originally established to protect the undemocratic structure that the 1960 coup wanted to create. In this context, the Constitutional Court must be restructured according to the nature of the new system of government.
The coup of May 27 of which was made known on June 12, 1960 regarding the “1” No. provisional laws with the rights of the Grand National Assembly of Turkey and the powers, as well as the jurisdiction on behalf of the Turkish nation, called the “Judge of the Supreme Court” icazetl and was usurped by the structure under the yoke. It was this illegitimate stained structure that judged the will of the nation in Yassıada and decided to execute the ministers and prime minister of the time. Unfortunately, many members of the Supreme Court of Justice became the founding members of the Constitutional Court established at that time and formed the main framework of this court. In addition, Salim Başol, who served as the president of the Supreme Court of Justice, the gunman of the May 27 coup, was elected a principal member of the Constitutional Court in the following years.
While the Court was expected to make decisions in accordance with the Constitution, its political and ideological obsession caused deep wounds in the conscience of the nation. For this reason, it is urgent to carry out the reforms that allow the Presidential Government System to continue and strengthen itself on healthy ground and without delay. At a time when all traces of the 1960 coup were eliminated with a moral and political consensus and all the consequences of the persecutory trials were ignored, the Constitutional Court must once again be on the table with all its elements. High democratic standards require it, along with the spirit and principles of the Presidential System of Government.
“CAT POWER will be TURKEY POWER”
Accelerating the democratization process in Turkey does not contradict the democratic, effective, fair Presidential System of Government, far from being the focus of the debate “Supreme Court”, the term is a “Divan-i Ali” The establishment will add strength to the power of Turkey . The task of the political institution is to account for the dark periods and determine the needs of future Turkish centuries and Turkish generations, and quickly implement the democratic steps and steps necessary for the construction of a powerful state. This will provide legal, de facto, intellectual and spiritual salvation from the sad and chaotic periods of the past.
The recent decisions of the Constitutional Court are painful and paralyzed. In the name of rights violations, irreparable damage is done to national rights and the sense of justice. They recognize that with Turkey’s coup against democracy it will affect the future and the independence of the institutions with hesaplaştık in a safe and stable manner. At the beginning of the New Legislative Year, it is our sincere expectation that this issue be evaluated and discussed with sincerity, prudence, without prejudice, in accordance with the morality of democracy and national realities. “
