Support from German teachers from Turkey’s eastern Mediterranean



[ad_1]

Matz-Lück made a statement on the Tagesschau news portal about developments in the Eastern Mediterranean.

Noting that Greece or the Greek Cypriot side disagrees with the statement that Ankara will be empty-handed if its line prevails on disputed matters, Matz-Lück said:

“I think Turkey’s position is no longer as bad as shown. Because the continental shelf and is not necessarily determined even by a moderate economic zone of the border, in this context, justice and equity are also had In the context of finding a solution to the border dispute at the international level, the role of the length of the coast It is considered that the distortion border lines can be excluded from the border line if necessary from the smaller islands. This, in Turkey, in Turkey, the mainland and the Greek islands can only lead to a greater part of the determination of a central line. Therefore, the question on the Greek side is not as simple as you think. “

NO AGREEMENT, EXISTING CONTINUES

class = “cf”>

The German professor noted that the current stalemate will continue unless an agreement is reached between the two eastern Mediterranean countries or the dispute is taken to an arbitration tribunal or an international tribunal.

Matz-Lück asserted that in cases where there is a short distance between the borders of states in international law and countries cannot claim rights over all their maritime jurisdictions, the expectation is the agreement of the states.

Territorial waters of reality where so different interpretations pointed out that Matz-Lück in terms of extending, “International maritime law has defined it as 12 knots. Because in 1923 Lausanne said that the Peace Treaty provides for 3 nautical miles. Turkey is demanding and 6 mph. Parties Or the dispute may be taken to an international tribunal or an arbitration tribunal. Otherwise, the boundaries are not clear. ” found the evaluation.

“THERE IS A DIFFERENCE IN THE CONTINENTAL SHELF”

Nele Matz-Lück, on the question of the legal situation in the eastern Mediterranean, according to which there is a border between the two states on the continental shelf of attention, “the continental shelf of the United Nations is defined in the Convention on the Right of the Sea. Turkey has never been on this side. According to the legal precedent states Shore 200 are accepted up to the knots and will be able to claim a continental shelf beyond if necessary. Turkey itself is moving at least it can make such a request in terms of the mainland. It is denied that it is also a right to the island. In other words, in this sense a difference of opinion between Turkey and Greece are experiencing “. used expressions.

class = “cf”>

While German academics complain from other states affected by economic regions of the agreement signed between Libya pointing out that Turkey can apply between Libya and Turkey, he said:

However, this agreement is an agreement against Greece, since it denies the right of continental shelf and exclusive economic zone of the Greek islands. In this sense, the Turkish-Libyan agreement is not allowed by international law and has no effect on Greece. On the other hand, the agreement signed between Greece and Egypt. It should also be viewed in terms of Turkey’s claim to reverse the decline. ignoring the legitimate claims of the Turkey agreement has no effect. “

“ASSOCIATION OF RESEARCH VESSELS BY MILITARY VESSELS FEAR OF CONFLICT”

Professor Matz-Lück, referring to the sine die boundary line of the public’s deposits of natural resources to the question definitely, “According to the maritime legal order, the legal precedents recognize the possibility, of course they do. Perhaps Turkey can accept it, but Greece, legal in claiming only on the resources, he refuses because he believes he is in a better position. ” said.

class = “cf”>

That fueled the conflict for fear of not being accompanied by military ships to the Turkish research vessel, Matz-Lück stressed, “This is not against the law, but the other party to increase the military presence in the disputed area, knowing that it will increase its military presence -two exacerbates the Arasında NATO countries- dispute significantly, “said its used.

[ad_2]