The suit marks a major escalation in the battle between President Donald Trump and the wildly popular TikTok, which has 100 million users in the US and is owned by a Chinese company, ByteDance.
TikTok argued in federal court in California that the administration did not give the company a fair chance to defend itself against accusations that it posed a national security risk. And it claims that Trump’s executive order is illegally based on emergency law in ways that do not apply to TikTok.
TikTok has previously said that it stores data about its US users in the United States and in Singapore, and that it would deny any request from the Chinese government for US user data.
The complaint cited Trump’s anti-China rhetoric, including his repeated references to the novel coronavirus as the “China virus” and “Kung flu.”
“The president’s actions clearly reflect a political decision to campaign on an anti-China platform,” TikTok’s complaint said.
For weeks, the US Committee on Foreign Investment has been analyzing TikTok and its potential risks to US security. In its blog post, TikTok claimed that CFIUS “reversed its decision within five minutes of its deadline” and concluded that it had identified national security risks in TikTok.
“The CFIUS letter was in principle based on outdated news articles, failed to address the bulky documentation that Plaintiff had provided to prove the security of TikTok user data, and was deficient in several other respects,” the complaint said. of TikTok.
TikTok also claimed that Trump’s justification for his executive order required the same emergency law he cited in an earlier executive order directed at Huawei, the Chinese telecommunications company. But Tiktok is nothing like Huawei, the company claimed.
“TikTok Inc. is not a telecommunications provider and it provides the types of technology and services considered by the 2019 Executive Order,” the complaint said.
Robert Chesney, a professor of national security law at the University of Texas-Austin, said the chances of TikTok’s success are not very high on their argument for the reasoning process – although the legal challenge may still be capable of delays in the prohibition to do so.
“Getting the lawsuit was delayed long enough so that Joe Biden wins [the election] could be their whole game, “said Chesney. But, he added,” I think it’s unlikely that the delay strategy will achieve anything. I do not think Joe Biden will withdraw the executive order. They will be very hawkish about China. “
– Selina Wang of CNN contributed reporting.
.