[ad_1]
Wissanu reveals 3 reasons to declare a serious emergency By having the security department assess Before being brought to the cabinet meeting Confirm that ‘Big Tu’ does not use martial law.
At 11:15 a.m. on November 25, 2020 at the Government House of Mr. Wisanu Krea-ngam, Deputy Prime Minister When mentioning the case of the village group that changed the meeting place in front of the Thai Panich Bank head office, Ratchayothin intersection instead of the former royal property office, Wang Daeng intersection that he did not know about this matter
Stay on top of the news Press to follow the live news line.
The reporter asked That group of protesters met in the private economic area. You can declare martial law or not. Mr. Wisanu said he asked to stop talking about martial law. Because both General Prayut Chan-ocha, Prime Minister and Defense Minister and General Prawit Wongsuwan, Deputy Prime Minister said that martial law will not be adopted. If the protesters moved from the assembly in front of the Crown Property Office, the sensitivity was no different than any other day’s meeting. That he had met before But if he still confirms the assembly in front of the royal property It will be more sensitive than ever
The reporter asked if the protesters returned to the area. This shows that normal laws can be used to control the situation, right? Mr. Wissanu said any existing law can be used. Without using martial law You can apply and reiterate that the government has never thought of using martial law. Where did the reporter get the news that he had been thinking about it? Having martial law is no different. From the absence of this time But the declaration of martial law This gives the soldiers the power to control the situation. In fact, when the 2005 Emergency Decree was announced, the Army was appointed as the Chief State Director of the State Control Officer. But in this emergency situation he changed the police to be the Chief Director of the Situation Control Officer. That it is no different By declaring an emergency situation It is lighter than the enactment of martial law. But the power was not that different. But the person who acts is different
The reporter asked if it was necessary to return to declare a serious emergency. In the Bangkok area again? Mr. Wisanu said no, but if he announces, there will be no problem. It is with the security agency who will assess the seriousness of the situation. Must return Serious emergency situations In the Bangkok area again That the security agency should assess the news that How serious will that assembly be? Considering 3 elements: 1. The importance of places like the royal palace area, the royal area, the place of residence 2. View from the crowd If there are weapons or tools 3. Look at the risks of confrontation and shock. And if the security department deems it necessary to declare a serious emergency, it must seek cabinet approval. Or if you see that there is an urgent need to advertise immediately, you can. And then presented to the cabinet meeting in accordance with the procedure It can be seen in the event that the crowd blocked the procession that took place at night. But the protesters still settled in front of the Government House. Therefore he declared a serious emergency at 4 a.m. the other day. At that time, the security agency estimated that the protesters were still seated. And in the area close to the real area If there is a movement, the protesters may affect the government house And they have assessed the risks of the protesters Therefore, decided to declare such a serious emergency.
The reporter asked if the police are now issuing a subpoena for the leaders of the protesters with Article 112, do you think it would improve the situation? The deputy prime minister said he did not know what he thought of him.
The reporter asked about the fact that the protesters announced the assembly for five days in a row, where the place and time would be clearly identified again. Will the government declare a serious emergency? Mr. Wissanu said that the number of days of protest is not a problem. But if there is a level of violence or not AND I need to consider the 3 main things already mentioned. All security agencies must be ready at all times. While looking at the risks of another massive group that the government tried not to provoke a confrontation by asking them to stay apart, which if the two sides could be very far apart, would make the situation much lighter.
When asked where they are currently meeting, if one group of protesters has met, there is usually another group. Advertised to gather nearby areas too Will there be any risks? Mr. Wissanu said that this happened a lot. It is common But in fact, if different people come But the two sides clashed in front of Parliament.
The reporter asked if the masses in yellow shirts announced that they would wait for people in front of the barrier. To explain the facts Doubt to know Is this a provocation? The deputy prime minister said if it cleared up, it wouldn’t provoke. But if it is not clarified, it is considered a provocation. If Piyawat is used to explain reason and effect, it is not provocative. To incite or stay away from the behavior You may not have to say anything, just sticking your tongue out is provocative.
When asked if the prime minister is concerned about third parties he may intervene or not, Wisanu said to be careful not to cause it. Every time there is an assembly there will always be one, two, three, four, five hands.
[ad_2]
