[ad_1]
“Vishnu” insists “Sen.-Sen.” It is submitted to interpret “draft amendments to the Constitution”, it does not interrupt the resolution process. Even if the court accepted the matter better because there is still something to be resolved in time Of course, there is a possibility that the “court” will not accept because the matter has not yet occurred while the Referendum Law hopes to enforce the month of February of the next year.
On November 12, at the Government House, Mr. Wissanu Krea-ngam, Deputy Prime Minister Revealed the government’s criticism that insincere in amending the constitution after the parliamentarians of Palang Pracharat (NACC) and several senators appointed the council to present it to the Constitutional Court to interpret the draft constitution. In the case of constituting an unconstitutional Constituent Assembly (Sen. Ror) o This story is difficult to tell. Because the draft constitutional amendment belongs to parliamentarians, not government, if parliamentarians and senators are suspicious of presenting and interpreting the principles, then don’t stumble into the process. And from what he looked at, he didn’t stumble, because he considered Don’t do it now, do it in the future, it might be too late to fix. Or there will be damage like holding a referendum and it will be even worse
Outstanding news
Mr. Wissanu said he assumed he might have good intentions. Not a day, it has to be shipped anyway. Sending now can save you more time. Because it is mandatory If the referendum ends Because article 256 of the Constitution states that if there is a member of Parliament The suspect has the right to be admitted to the court within 30 days, if he appears now he can save 1 month, until then, you may not have to submit. So if there is something, we can still fix it in time. It is better to keep it under the exception of not stumbling, because from November 17 to 18, agenda 1 is voted, if it is approved, the commission takes about a month and if at that time it is successfully sent to the Constitutional Court. The matter went to court. If the court says it won’t stop, it will end. The process continues. By waiting for the referendum process, but having to wait for the Referendum Law to come into force, which is expected to be in February next year, and confirm whether the court accepts the matter. The parliamentary process did not stop.
When asked if there is a possibility that the Constitutional Court will not accept the consideration. Because the matter had not yet happened, Mr. Wissanu said that there was an opportunity because he submitted the request in accordance with the regulations of the 31st meeting of the Parliament, not necessarily a conflict. This is the authority of the Council. In the past, the government had sent to discuss it and did not accept. In Mr. Chuan Leekpai’s term as Prime Minister, the court said the matter had not yet happened. The court is not legal advisor. If you want to know, you have to ask the Council of State.
When asked whether or not it is expected, in addition to the issue of the interpretation of the parliamentarians, it will be interpreted that the referendum In case there is before or after the adoption of the constitutional principle, Wissanu said that the draft that he presented now contained such issues. Because whether you are asked to establish MPs or not, the court will not accept
Read more …
