VAR jokes !! What I want to say after Liverpool lost 2 points

Liverpool’s 2 goals were recovered by VAR before VAR carefully handled the second penalty for Brighton to tie as well.

1. Jürgen Klopp put together an incomplete team in a 4-2-3-1 system, with Joel Matip disappearing, one more, and the need for a youngster like Neco Williams. With Natt Phillips

Takumi Minamino entered the ‘low face’ position to deliver the goal to Roberto Firmino, flanked by Mo Salah and Diocochota, while Jordan Henderson and Sadi. Omane was locked in the back of the bench.

Even if it is not formed correctly But with a higher quality and standard, it should be ‘okay’ that the swan partitions started in the first 10 minutes, clearly superior.

2. Brighton is a team that can play in a “form” style. They will use a set of balls from their own territory as they connect the ball and fight the opponent.

After settling in, they started to have more control over the ball. Before using a simple stroke For example, place a cut to the back to attack Liverpool where the defensive line seems loose. And there are holes to attack

The local people played quite well. Accurate ball transmission, both short and long But the problem that has always been with the Nu Nang South team is that there is no absolute certainty

He often plays well, takes risks, and launches him into space. Fine AND get a chance to lead first I keep trying to flush it down the toilet

3. At the same time it was a game where Liverpool were below their own standards, right back Neco Williams became a weakness. The center is not good to drive the game, Minamino in position number 10 is too common, there are no tricks, the attack game seems slow and without ferocity. Also, find a little less rhythm to finish the score.

However, Brighton’s lack of sharpness punished them. Because there is an opportunity and you cannot do it alone. I finally lost the door to the Reds

4. When Liverpool lead 1-0, there should be no problem. Despite not showing good form together But the home team’s attacking game was not effective enough

But who knows that the VAR will act!

Brighton’s penalty came from the moment Andy Robertson struck Danny Welbeck’s feet.

Seen from slow motion The player Swan called ‘Robbo’ had no intention of fouling.

Without repeating at that time, it is unlikely that the ‘great god’ will have possession of the ball. Or hook the ball to the beat of the goal too

According to Common Sense, this is not likely to be a penalty.

Or not then no one would say

But promoters of justice like the VAR do not release it. And let the referee go see for himself again

I see it, like most young swans, that it shouldn’t be a ‘penalty’.

Oh! And why? Is the referee assuming it is a penalty ???

The reason I can explain it here is … that court judges are too “honest” about the rules.

It’s easy to think like this: if this happens outside the penalty area, it’s a foul, because Robertson’s foot hit Welbeck’s foot without touching the ball.

If according to the rules, it is a foul If it occurs outside the area, it is a free throw. If it occurs in a district, it is a sanction according to the principle of ‘jurisprudence’.

But if he uses ‘political science’ or has ‘art’ to judge, even if Welbeck falls short of that skill, he won’t be able to score goals. The ball sprouted away from him from the get-go.

5. In addition to blame for the excessive honesty of judgment Including the humility of the VAR, Liverpool must blame themselves for not playing very well. And unsuccessfully scored the second goal

Still, I still want to raise the Man of the Match position to VAR, it is correct that the tour ran according to regulations, and the man from United who was not involved in anything should also be hit by the tail.

Boo.