[ad_1]
March 22, 64. In the Criminal Court, Ratchadapisek Road, Ms. Surirat Chivarak, mother of Mr. Prit Chivarak or Penguin, came to hear Mr. Prit’s trial for violating the jurisdiction of the court. If you read the statement of protest for the fast in the courtroom on March 15, the past of Ms Sureerat. Interviewed that in the past he was not allowed to visit his son only by asking through a team of lawyers. Know that the child is stressed, not happy and protests with the fast. As a result, the weight is reduced by about 1 kg per day, which makes it quite tiring.
Ms Sureerat said that in today’s investigation she might have had the opportunity to speak with her son. The fasting of the son will be discussed. Because personally I am quite concerned about the child’s health Because most of the articles visited The team of lawyers will do the job. As for food, the son used to share it with his friends in prison. Personally, he only drinks water and milk, which does not concern him in the event of violating his son’s court. But he was concerned that he would be prosecuted under Penal Code, Section 112 more than trying to post bail.
Mr. Krisadaang Nuttajarat, a lawyer with the Center for Human Rights Lawyers, said that he had to discuss the approach to court with Mr. Prit. But he admits he is concerned about this point. As for Mr. Prit’s prison life after fasting since March 16, he suffered from fatigue and weight loss.
[ad_2]
