[ad_1]
The criminal court dismissed the corruption cases. “Maj. Gen. Chansit”, the former Inspector General and a total of 8 people with discretion to propose. “Big Toy – Wirachai Song Mercy” is bad discipline. The sound clips of the “Big Joke” car shooting case lose the right to be appointed as a police officer.
On March 30, 2021 in the Central Criminal Court corruption and misconduct cases The court reads the verdict at the data investigation level, prosecuted by Major General Wirachai Songmetta, former Deputy Commissioner of the Royal Thai Police As the plaintiff filed a lawsuit Pol. Major General Chansit Wattanawarangkun, Deputy Chief of Police, Former National Police Department General Nirundon Leuampsri, Pol.Maj.Gen. Wirawit Wachanaphuk Ka, Pol. Lieutenant Pol. Khor Somuang Phuengsap, Lieutenant Colonel Aukrit Srisuakham, Lieutenant Colonel Jirapat Phrom Sitthikarn, Lieutenant Colonel Pol. Somkiat Khamchu and Lieutenant Colonel Nipaphon Sukniyom, all eight, were charged in the act of playing improperly their duties under Penal Code, Section 157
Outstanding news
The plaintiff sued the 8 defendants as civil servants. And has the authority to investigate facts Prepare a report on the results of the investigation. And reporting the results of the investigation to Major General Chakthip Chaijinda, the commander of the Royal Thai Police (at the time), issued an order to appoint a fact-checking committee. According to the National Police Order 24/2020, the media has featured news about phone clips, conversations in case a criminal shot a car of Lieutenant General Surachet Hakphal between Major General Chakthip Chaijinda and the plaintiff
The 8 defendants, as a practical investigation committee OR refrain from performing duties inappropriately. Prepare together a report with a summary of the investigation of the facts on the action of the plaintiff. It alleged that the plaintiff’s actions contained sufficient information to know that he had committed serious disciplinary offenses. It is a discretionary exercise. It is not considered by using fair, precise and adequate discretion. As a reason for the plaintiff to be charged with criminal charges It was created for a serious disciplinary investigation. And he was rescheduled to vacate the position of Deputy Commissioner of the National Police. Causing harm to the plaintiff Lack of qualifications to be nominated for the position of Royal Thai Police Commissioner I did not receive payment for the position AND withdrawing from the Police Commissioner’s office
Previously, in the impeachment class, he ordered the Royal Thai Police to Submit a copy of the investigation report in accordance with the appointment of the investigation committee No. 24/2020 and a copy of the investigation report in accordance with the appointment of the investigation committee. investigation 383/2020 along with a copy to the court. With reservation order from the plaintiff’s government For consideration
The court considered that When there is an opinion on the investigation report of the eight defendants and all are based on the action of the plaintiff. The eight defendants diagnosed with the fact of the plaintiff’s actions occurred. But the opinions of the 8 defendants and those that do not coincide with the opinion of the plaintiff. Inevitably, it cannot be said that it is practical to summarize the opinions of the 8 defendants with those of the investigation report. Or refraining from improperly performing duties OR dishonestly accused by the plaintiff The lawsuit was unable to hear that the plaintiff filed a crime. The court dismissed the plaintiff’s case.
Read more …
