[ad_1]
September 6, 2020
5,736
“The Navy Page” runs an article Why is there a “submarine” in the context of geographic restrictions?
On September 6, 63, the reporter reported that the page “Marina by Navy spokesperson” published photos and messages on the subject. “Why are there submarines … in the context of geographic restrictions?” States that
to have “Submarine” Why go … in the context of geographic restrictions
Due to the fact that I have studied the strategic level of security and military. From institutions both abroad and in the country Monitor the global and regional situation Teaching on this topic has continued at the military higher education institution. Therefore, I would like to share views on maritime safety. To improve understanding and awareness about the sea Engaging with the mouth and stomach of the people Consuming the well-being of the nation’s people And economic development of the country However, I would like to present according to the facts. Without politics AND adherence to the soldiers In which this first part will lead to an answer that “Why did you have a submarine?”
First, it is important to understand the geopolitics that Thailand is geographically limited, that is, the Gulf of Thailand is a closed bay deep in the peninsula. In the past, the bay had been closed 3 times, the first time King Narai the Great in Horlanda took a battleship on the Chao Phraya River and closed the road to the Thai Sea. “Buppesan Niwat” Yes, the second time was an RS 112 event, the reign of King Rama V in France to cover the estuary of Thailand. Until we have to lose a land almost equal to the size of Thailand today and the 3rd time in WWII that the American submarine sinks a so-called tanker. Samui Hospital in the Thai estuary 36 sailors lost their lives, resulting in the inability to transport oil from the sea to the country. Economic activity was practically interrupted. People were in trouble during the 3 previous events, this should let them know that Our geographical weakness How can the invaders take advantage of the enormous damage that the country suffers?
So do we have a solution? … This matter has to be seen how they are doing abroad. Let me compare it to Germany to make it easier to see and understand.
Germany, like Thailand in reverse, has two seas, but is separated by a third country. The main ports are Hamburg and Wilhelmhaven, on the Baltic and the North Sea. That the shipping route has to go through many countries. Despite the Kiel Canal But in wartime it was easily blocked by landmines laid by the enemy. Therefore, it is necessary to develop the potential to deter countries that will threaten the sea lanes. And transporting energy to the country By continuing to operate six of the most modern class 212A electric submarines, despite the cancellation of the Warsaw Pack, there was no significant threat. And one that is worth noting is The Baltic and North Seas have average water depths near the Gulf of Thailand. But the German navy rebuilt “Black ship” Larger water than what was used in WWI and WWII, one reason is that submarines are offensive weapons. Difficult to detect AND keeps working longer Able to escape to destroy the opponent’s main force even before they have not entered their marine territory. Therefore, the main operational areas are outdoors. Which will create a greater deterrent power.
Like the saying “It is not seen anywhere but it is present everywhere” translated into Thai simply as “I cannot see myself But create fear everywhere.” Hence, the need for a submarine. It may not be the only threat But a potential deterrent needs to be created Reduce geographic disadvantage Make invaders dependent on existing conflict conditions Must restrict first action OR be treacherously attacked from outside Make results not worth losing Therefore gave up the intention to offend in the end
To answer that “Why did you have a submarine?” In addition to filling the gaps in geographic restrictions As already mentioned, other factors are still involved to demonstrate profitability, such as geopolitical strengthening. Guarantee the freedom to participate in marine economic activities. And build confidence in investment in the Thai marine economy, etc.
In addition, a series of public questions should be addressed, such as: What are the risks involved? “Submarine” In this situation why not invest in underwater submarines, it would be better? Is the idea of supplying a submarine considered obsolete? Because in the future there will be underwater drones to destroy a submarine and the Gulf of Thailand is shallow, many boats and fishing equipment are not hampered by the operation of the submarine? And when they are purchased, can they keep them ready to use for their shelf life or not etc etc …
These matters I see that there is a need for a response to need, profitability and willingness of the taxpaying public to cover all risks.
