“The kilometer of the referendum” repeats the reform of the constitution, collapses, the plan to close the door to death.



[ad_1]

“The kilometer of the referendum” repeats the reform of the constitution, collapses, the plan to close the door to death.

On March 27, 2021 at 5:48 p.m.

By … Chai Rit Yon Piem

*****************

Write a new constitution that will hopefully create reconciliation. Probably no success in government. General Prayut after parliament voted to revoke the draft constitutional amendment to Section 256 to establish the Senate last week. Following the decision of the Constitutional Court. Several obstacles are yet to be encountered in the hope that the new constitution will be successfully created. In achieving the objectives of the constitution project of the 2017 constitution That the mechanical field does not want to be able to easily resolve the constitution

After the victory of the Palang Pracharat Party and Senator Prayut Chan-o-cha opened the royal elements during Gave an interview during the 67th birthday that “I am not objectionable if I want to correct the Constitution … If there are suspicions that I will inherit power, then go and amend the Constitution. Choose me or not, I won’t be disappointed. If you don’t choose, you can go and fix the (Constitution). Come and fix it. “

General Prayut’s attitude I am glad to see the amendment to the Constitution. “Solve it now” Because they trust the opposition and the 3-inch mob will never push to resolve the constitution for sure.

Extraction plan to reform the constitution. In addition to the voice of the prime minister in hand, it also contains profound government plans. Even the proud Thai party AND two Democratic parties with the point of view of creating a new constitution In the end, it was not so active as to try to fix the constitution.

The latest draft of the Law of the Constituent Assembly on a referendum or “Kilometer referendum”That it is nearing completion. That it is a tool to support the referendum to amend the constitution. And it is in the process of considering Agenda 2-3, it is repeating the same fate as the amendment to the Constitution, Article 256 that abortion

Previously, many parties were confident that the consideration will be quiet. And it must be approved by Agenda 3 Of the parliament of the previous week. If you follow this timeline Today I would prepare to bring the tools. He announced to advance in the preparation of a referendum that Will people agree to make a new constitution? But I stumbled upon those STS MPs who modify content and can enter The trap opens the channel to send to the Constitutional Court. Interpret that the km referendum may conflict with the constitution or not.

The issues that put the km referendum at risk are “Section 9” tHow to make a referendum There was an amendment at the parliament meeting. Parliamentarians and the coalition government voted in favor of the amendment. MP, Pheu Thai Party As a minority commission requesting to amend this section Requesting to increase the power of the public sector and parliament to allow the government to hold a referendum. That the original conditions established in the constitution That is, only the Cabinet can request a referendum.

Party of the Joint Government of Deputies Votes changed the game to support the opposition until the latter won by almost 273 to 267, with only 6 votes difference, according to news reports, the party was found to be led by the entire Pride Thai Party. Interestingly, nearly half of the Democrats, MPs on the Palang Pracharat Party side found that 34 did not vote, as did 77 senators.

If you think about it, if the Senate and the Palang Pracharat Party or even the Bhumjaithai and Pracharat Party Vote to support the majority of the votes. Consideration for referendum Until now, term 3 could be over. This led to the questioning, Is it a plan of the government, especially the Palang Pracharat Party and the Senator, that intends to overturn the referendum table to hammer the coffin to block another layer of amendment to the constitution, as used by the deputies of the Palang Pracharat Party and the Senate? This joke? It was not possible to amend Section 256, as it was presented to the Constitutional Court, interpreted, followed by a resolution not to support the vote on Agenda 3 with success.

Even the Democratic Party. It will be clarified later. Claiming the reasons for correcting that. Give the people and parliament the power to hold a referendum. It is good to help fill a gap in the Constitutional Court ruling in order to move forward and help with the referendum mechanism on the new constitution.

But in practice When amending Section 9, it is necessary to amend the referendum law in several sections like a xylophone. Which can delay consideration. Deputies, the government knows that “The random risk contradicts the Constitution” and continues to resolve it again, allowing to generate a track of legal consideration to have problems to pave the way to the presentation of the Constitutional Court. Last entry Sen. that he has already left and has told him The Constitutional Court will be safely filed, and if the Constitutional Court again rules that the constitution is contrary to the referendum process project, You can return on the same account Amendment to the Constitution, article 256

Many people proudly disappointed the position of the Joint Government Party in Thailand. By voting on agenda three, Section 256, Pride Thai showed that Play Good Drama Walkout did not vote for agenda 3 and cursed the power of Pracharat who did not sincerely resolve the Constitution.

Anutin Charnvirakul, Deputy Prime Minister, Leader of the Bhumjaithai Party, solemnly wishes to amend the Constitution. But they were caught letting the Seseng Party kids defect in the middle of the House of Commons before the person clarifies that the party didn’t leave. But leave according to S. Chada Thaiset, Bhumjaithai Party The person who came out to insult the Palang Pracharath Party, “Sia Nu”, defended that the party’s MPs could not vote for the third term because it was wrongly failing in the Constitutional Court.

In addition to insisting that from now on, the party will not push for amendments to each section. Regarding the undemocratic issue and the most discussed issue is the reduction of the competence of the Prime Minister or the Senate, Anutin insists that although he does not agree. But that should not be corrected because they want everyone to hold out a little longer. About 5 years of the dinosaurs You will lose the opportunity to use power to elect the prime minister.

When asked, if the amendment to the Constitution is unsuccessful, will they withdraw from government? “Sia Nu” That the amendment to the constitution is a matter of the council The administration of the country is a matter of the House of Commons, and the Democrats, the leaders of the parties and the leaders said that they will not withdraw because we still have the mission to work as a government .

The Phum Thai Party is as true as General Prayut. Whoever went out to challenge to solve the truth, knows both the proud Thai and the Democrat It is a component of a succession tool that reaches the government. So I’m sick of waiting to amend the constitution in accordance with the policy of the campaign itself. Because today two parties use their power as government Until the last cabinet adjustment The position of Vice Minister of Commerce was also exchanged With the Vice Minister of Transportation Allow each party to fully control the ministry

Amendments to the Constitution, if the vents are not opened Take advantage only Intercept as a team, as you can see in the future, the conflict will escalate. And they are more likely to suffer losses, it is not convenient to think that there is a majority and do anything arbitrarily. Importantly, this is not a democratic majority. But it is most unjustified constitutional norms Today, the country’s rules must be resolved urgently. Before it is too late

**********************

[ad_2]