The Electoral Commission withdrew the names of 19 additional candidates, most of whom had their voting rights restricted.



[ad_1]

December 8, 2020 – The Office of the Provincial Administrative Organization (ECT) has published a decision of the Election Commission of Thailand revoking the names of 19 additional candidates for the Council of Provincial Administrative Organization from the recipient list. Request an election previously announced by the Director of Elections of the Provincial Administrative Organization, after finding that there is a prohibition against exercising the right to stand for election in accordance with Section 50 of the Law on Elections of the Local Council or Local Administrators 2019 Contains: 1. Mr. Nat Kaewnan, the applicant, Nakhon Ratchasima Provincial Administrative Organization, Pak Chong District 4, due to the audit results, although “Korat media” with Mr. Nat’s name Owning will stop the business.But there is no evidence that the ad was canceled as a publisher, advertiser, publisher or owner of a newspaper. Therefore, he still considered Mr. Nat to be the owner or shareholder of a newspaper business. 2. Mr. Phakawat Tanamai, Candidate for Lopburi Provincial Administrative Organization, Chaiban District 1, has been the subject of a final judgment for violating the law on gambling in 3. Mr. Sompop Chanthawong, candidate, administrative organization Provincial, Ubon Ratchathani Province, Muang District, District 1 for not being a Thai citizen by birth

4. Mr. Phachok Kerdkai, a candidate for Sor, Surin Province, Muang District, District 4, because he had previously been sentenced to prison in Buriram Province. The base carries a vehicle with a load greater than that specified for driving on Highway 5. Mr. Kraisorn Haemram, Candidate for Provincial Administrative Organization, Surin Province, Si Narong 1 District, because he had previously been detained in the center of central detention, Pathum Thani province In the case of electric amusement ride (Hi-Lo) 6. Mr. Sauk Chum Licorice, the SAO candidate, Lopburi District, Muang District, District 9, because he had to render a final judgment for having committed a violation of the gambling law as a merchant 7. Mr. Preecha Chantasen, Candidate for Provincial Administrative Organization of Udon Thani, Thung Kalasin District, as a partner and managing partner of Laemthong Radio Limited Partnership, which operates the business of broadcasting

While number 8-19 consisted of Ms Nuanchan Sittichan, the candidate, Buriram Provincial Administrative Organization, Satuek District 3, Ms Somjai Prasert Sawat. Applicants from Buriram Provincial Administrative Organization, Muang District 2, Mr. Narin Arpharam, Applicants from Burirom Provincial Administrative Organization, Muang District, Buriram Province, Ms. Achiraya Khumsuwan, Applicants from Administrative Organization Administrative Organization Provincial of Thailand. Buriram District Nangrong District 2 Ms. Lamyai Kluea Applicants Provincial Administrative Organization of S. Buriram Prakhonchai District 1 Ms. Premikanamkot Applicants Provincial Administrative Organization of Sr. Buriram Prakhon Chai District 1 Mr. Prakit Chachamarn Applicant, Buriram Provincial Administrative Organization, Lam Plai Mat District 3 Mr. Winai Wongyee Applicant, Buriram Provincial Administrative Organization District 1 Mr. Arun Submak Applicant Buriram Provincial Administrative Organization Satuek District 2 Ms. Kanokwan Kaewyongkot Applicant for Provincial Administrative Organization Buriram Province Lahansai District 2 Mr. Surasak Apaichit Applicant for provincial administrative organization Buriram Province Lahansai District 2 Mr. Manit Candidate Watcharanon, Buriram Provincial Administrative Organization Chalerm Prakiat All did not turn out to vote for deputies on March 24, 62 and were prevented from voting during 2 years from the day of the elections that they did not exercise their rights. Therefore, having a forbidden nature



[ad_2]