[ad_1]
The Election Commission passed a resolution to prosecute criminal cases Thanathorn-15, the former Royal Commission, the new future Loan Tracks 191 million Designated with a prison term of no more than 5 years, a fine not to exceed 100,000 baht, or both AND the court ordered the revocation of voting rights for 5 years.
On October 26, news reports reported that the EC meeting. Resolved, That the ECT report on the criminal proceedings against Mr. Thanathorn. Therefore prosperity Former Future Forward party leader AND 15 former members of the Executive Committee of the Constitutional Court’s decision to dissolve the Future Forward Party Due to the offense of Section 66, along with Section 72, the Political Party Decree borrowed 191.2 million baht from Mr. Thanathorn.
Stay on top of the news Press to follow the live news line.
To prosecute Thanathorn, it will be a crime to donate more than 10 million baht according to Section 66, paragraph one of the Code of Political Parties 60, which will carry a penalty under Section 124, imprisonment for a maximum of 5 years, a fine not to exceed 100,000. Baht or both AND the court ordered the revocation of voting rights for 5 years
While the former Executive Director will be prosecuted for the offense, Section 66 paragraph two and Section 72 together with Section 137, receiving donations of money, property or any other benefit from persons with a value of more than 10 million baht per year and receive donations of money, property or any other benefit. That it is known or should be known that it was illegal That you have a penalty under Section 125 and Section 126 of imprisonment for a period not to exceed 3 years and a fine not to exceed 1 million baht
The loan is for 191.2 million baht, under Section 125, which provides money, property or any other benefit. The excess that is prescribed in Section 66 is transferred to the political party development fund. It is expected that the Electoral Commission has not yet reached a conclusion on the matter. As before, there were differences of opinion between the Office of the Electoral Commission and the Legal Advisory Board of the Electoral Commission. The bureau department suggested that money could be seized in the political party development fund. However, the ECT legal advisory panel saw that when the Constitutional Court ordered the party’s dissolution, there were no political parties left that would allow the Electoral Commission to raise money for the Fund.
[ad_2]
