[ad_1]
December 5, 2020 – The Election Commission of Thailand (Electoral Commissioner) published a decision on the right to be elected as members of the Provincial Administrative Organization Council (17 additional members of the Provincial Administrative Organization Council), divided into those who have not been chosen. Announce the names on the candidate list AND filed an objection against not releasing the names of the names to the Electoral Commission, which the Electoral Commission found to have qualifications and did not have prohibited characteristics. In addition, there is an order to recruit and announce the list of candidates for a total of 8, consisting of Mr. Thanawat Waranwongcharoen, the candidate of the Provincial Administrative Organization of Samut Prakan Province, District 3, Mr. Thammanoon Kasettham, the SAO candidate. Lampang District 1, Mr. Padithon Saengkhun, Applicant, Mae Hong Son Provincial Administrative Organization, District 2, Mr. Natsak Sattayawong, Applicant for Provincial Administrative Organization Nong Bua Lam Phu District 1, Mr. Sunthorn Rattanakorn, Prime Minister, Organization Administrative Officer of Kamphaeng Phet Province, Mr. Sulaiman Wang, CPA Candidate, Krabi Provincial Administrative Organization, Region 3, Mr. Sangkhom Thananchan, Applicant for Provincial Administrative Organization, Yasothon Province 1, Colonel Prasert Thongyot, Applicant for Administrative Organization Provincial, Region 1 of Ubon Ratchathani Province
In the case of a petition against the hiring of the President, PAO and Provincial Administrative Organization. In which the Electoral Commission issued an order to dismiss the petition, resulting in a total of 3 candidates who remain candidates for the elections, including Mr. Chumpol Kanjana, the candidate for president of the Surat Thani Provincial Administrative Organization, the Mr. Su Pol Na Wichai, Candidate, Chiang Mai Provincial Administrative Organization, District 2, Mr. Surasak Suniphat, SAO Candidate, Yasothon Region 2
In addition, the Election Commission of Thailand is considering appearances before the Director of Elections of the PAO. In this regard, the Election Commission of Thailand issued an order to remove the name of the announcement from the list of 6 candidates, consisting of: 1. Mr. Itthiphol Srongsom, candidate of the Provincial Administrative Organization of Chiang Rai Province Due to the fact , was able to hear that Mr. Itthipol had been subject to final judgment for committing a fraudulent charge. It is a crime related to property committed with dishonesty according to the Penal Code. Therefore, being a person who has the prohibited nature to exercise the right to stand for election
2. Mr. Pattanaphong Rachapongkhan, candidate for the Bueng Kan Provincial Administrative Organization, due to the fact that Mr. Pattanapong is an operational assistant of Mr. Cherdphong Rachapongkhan, MPBungkan, therefore he is a qualified person. Banned for not exercising the right to stand for election In that case Even Mr. Pattanaphong There will be a withdrawal request. And he reported that he did not participate in any campaign activities, but Bueng Kan’s election commissioner said the election could not be withdrawn.
3. Mr. Watthana Sanguantham, Candidate for Provincial Administrative Organization of Buriram Province Due to the fact that Mr. Watthana was a defendant in a gambling case, the Nang Rong Provincial Court rendered the final verdict that he was guilty of the Gambling law, although Mr. Watthana claimed he was not the judge. And benefit from The Clear Mote Law on the occasion of the 80th anniversary of His Majesty King Bhumibol Adulyadej, 2007, but according to the verdict, it was found that Mr. Watthana confessed that he was a banker and in accordance with the Clean Malware Law. It only has the effect of assuming that the convicted person has never been punished by the sentence, but has no effect on invalidating the sentence. Mr. Watthana is therefore a person who is prohibited from exercising his right to stand for election.
4. Mr. Seksan Nirunpakorn, Candidate, Buriram Provincial Administrative Organization Due to the fact that Mr. Seksan was the defendant in the case Gambling Law The Nang Rong Provincial Court rendered the final verdict that he was guilty of the Gambling Law. Although Mr. Seksan claimed I once had to have such a trial as a dealer But benefit from Malotina Clear Law However, according to Malotina Clear Law It only has the effect of assuming that the convicted person has never been punished by the sentence, but not it has no effect on invalidating the sentence. Mr. Seksan is a person who is prohibited from using the right to stand in elections.
5. Mr. Noppadol Rungswang, Candidate, Saraburi Provincial Administrative Organization Due to the fact that Mr. Noppadol was sentenced to prison and released less than 5 years after Election Day AND it is not an offense that was committed due to negligence or pettiness. He is a person who is prohibited from exercising the right to stand in elections and 6. Mr. Phawatwes Bhakt, candidate of the Uthai Thani Provincial Administrative Organization. Due to the fact, it was heard that Mr. Phawat had the final judgment that he committed an offense in connection with dishonest acts under the Penal Code. It is a prohibited characteristic not to use the right to stand for election.
[ad_2]
