[ad_1]
December 30 20 – 1:30 pm Don Mueang District Court, Chaengwattana Road Prosecutor’s Office The 9th District Court Case Office filed a lawsuit against Ms. Bin, who did not know her real last name, with 94 people as defendants in Black Case No. 1318/2563.
When narrating that on December 28, 2020, at night, from the 1st to 94 defendants with those who have not yet sued They dared to get together to do activities AND mixing to play cards, Tiger, Dragon, Hi Lo and Fantan, It looks like a casino In the gambling hall The building has no number In front of Soi Sri Udom, Chaeng Watthana 14 Road, Thung Song Hong Sub-district, Lak Si District, Bangkok, which is a busy place. And under the area that the boss is in charge of resolving emergency situations in relation to security issues, so that he is at risk of pathogen transmission. Without entering the exceptions by law What is a violation of the law
By defendants 1, 2, 5, 6, 46, 47, Myanmar nationality Traveled to a natural canal In any sub-district, Mae Sai district, Chiang Rai province Defendant no. 3, 4, 85 – 88 Cambodian Traveled to a natural canal No area is evident, Aranyaprathet district, Sa Kaeo province, the 48th accused of Lao nationality, traveled through a natural canal. In Chong Mek Sub-district, Sirindhorn District, Ubon Ratchathani Province Without passing the inspection of the immigration officer in the channel AND you do not have a valid passport or document to replace AND in the Kingdom of Thailand The building has no number at the entrance from Soi Srisuk, Chaeng Watthana 14 Road, Thung Song Hong Subdistrict, Lak Si District, Bangkok without the permission of the competent official by law. And not exempt by law
Request sanction in accordance with the Law of Public Administration in Emergency Situations of 2005, Art. 4, 5, 9, 18 They declared a state of emergency in all areas of the Kingdom, on March 25, 63 Announced the matter Extension of the period of declaration of emergency in all areas of the Kingdom (9th ed.) Dated November 23, 2020, announcing the head of the person responsible for resolving the emergency situation With regard to security in relation to the prohibition of reunion and merger activities dated April 3, 2020, Immigration Act BE2522 Section 4,11,12,18,58, 62,81 Gambling Act of 1935, Section 4, 5, 6, 10, 12 , 15 Gambling Law (No. 5) BE2490, Section 3 May. Gambling Law (No. 7) BE2504, Section 3 includes Penal Code, Section 33,83,91
After examining the testimony of the 94 defendants through a video conferencing system. (Video conference) to Thung Song Hong Police Station What is the arrest of the defendant during the arrest and monitoring of the spread of COVID. Everyone makes the confession
The court then ruled that the 94 defendants were guilty of mutually violating the requirements of the Emergency Public Administration Act BE2548, Section 9, paragraph one (2), 18, with defendants 1-84 there. Offenses under the Gaming Act 1935, Section 4, paragraph one, paragraph two, 12 (2), defendant No. 85-94 is guilty of the Gambling Act 1935. Section 4, paragraph one, 12 (2) , along with Penal Code, Section 83, only defendants 1 – 6, defendant 46 – 48, defendant 85 – 88 remain guilty under the BE 1979 immigration law Section 11, 12 (1), 18, 62, 81 as well.
The actions of the 94 defendants were multiple crimes. That the defendant confessed But only for crimes under the Gambling Law, the court does not reduce the punishment As for other crimes, the punishment should be reduced by half, including imprisonment for defendants 1 – 6, defendants 46 – 48, defendants 85 – 88, every 7 months 15 days changing prison As a prison sentence instead of 7 months and 15 days per person
As for the 7th – 45 defendants, 49 – 84 defendants for each person in prison for 30 days and fined 12,000 baht each. Waiting for punishment (probation) and the defendant in 89 – 94 to prison for 30 days and a fine of 15,000 baht per person for jail time to wait. Expect the punishment too (probation)
The court issued a warrant for the arrest of defendant 1 – 6, defendant 46 – 48, defendant 85 – 88 (which sentenced the detention sentence instead of 7 months and 15 days) due to no bail. Other defendants paid the fine and were later released.
[ad_2]
