[ad_1]
The court accepted a lawsuit against “Dr. Seping” against “Young Khachai” against seven people who defamed the tracks. Appointment to check evidence on this November 16.
At 10:30 am on September 23, in Courtroom 902, Ratchadapisek Rd., The Court of Appointments for the Lawsuit Hearing Hearing Hearing Hearing, 1693/2562 at Dr. Beauty Face Did the plaintiff file a lawsuit against Mr. Kanchai or Num Kernploy, TV host of the Node Stream? On TV channel 3, Mr. Pinyo Phat Chidawan, lawyer and victim of the victims of the surgery That was listed, the 7 people are accused of defamation by advertising. That he filed a civil case in connection with a criminal case to claim compensation of 50 million baht.
Follow the news, press follow the line fresh news
In this case, the plaintiff filed on July 3, 2019, stating that the plaintiff was the founder of the Phase of by Doctor Seping project. Surgery consultation If someone is going to do it, it is recommended to do it with a standard hospital on April 4, 2019, the Node Stream program on Channel Three. Symptoms of the show “Part 2 Phase of Changing the Face of a Ghost” were unveiled with Mr. Kanchai as the host inviting other defendants to join the show.
Characteristics of talking, asking each other, planning to put the plaintiff Although the plaintiff is anonymous, he uses a technique to name the title of the article in order to link him to the plaintiff. And he also took the news that Lieutenant General Surachet Hakphal issued a press release in reference to the program. With the intention of making the plaintiff defame, be disrespectful, hate He therefore asked to be punished for defamation
Read the news Kunchai reveals that Seping wants to show his face, turning the young man’s face into a theory
Also when there is news and the program is broadcast, it was turned off, which made it difficult for anyone to use the Dr. Seping project. Or canceled all appointments that the plaintiff plans to do business and will apply for deputies, but the reputation must come to an end. Therefore, he requested compensation of 50 million baht.
Today Dr. Seping The plaintiff and his lawyer went to court. The defense has lawyers and attorneys-in-fact. Come listen to the orders on the data query floor
The court examines the plaintiff’s evidence at the data investigation level already submitted. The plaintiff testified that the seven defendants had jointly defamed the plaintiff through publicity. From speaking together on Channel 3’s “Nhon Krai” program, Mr. Kanchai, the first defendant, brought a video of the police officer’s press conference to accompany and explain on the program. That has both names The last name and the photograph of the plaintiff in the diagram of the link created by the police. And it is the image and sound that appear in the media. Named The plaintiff clearly at said press conference was attended by many defendants and also delivered flowers.
All 7 defendants intend to communicate with the general public and know that the person named on the list is the plaintiff with the intent to insert. Causing harm to the plaintiff Disgrace By publicity with documents In this class, the questioning of the 7 defendants is not enough to disprove the plaintiff’s evidence. He saw that the plaintiff’s case had data and had the case for his consideration AND arranged the examination of the evidence Take the testimony to schedule a cross-examination of witnesses on November 16 at 9:00 am
After the court accepted the lawsuit, Dr. Se Ping, chairman of the cosmetic surgery program, Face Off, said he was happy that the court ordered the case to be guilty. As filed Because in the past it had been damaged Degrading both reputation and business Worth several hundred million baht
Jamnong Chaiyamongkol, a lawyer, said that after this the Criminal Court will organize a trial for the accused. That he will send a summons within 7 days after this As for the evidence that the defense attorney’s side will bring to combat the case Fraud issues In this regard, you are not concerned since Dr. Seping Not claimed fraudulently by the other party Also, there are some cases that the defendant has brought before the Civil Court for damages. That the civil court to dismiss the case
While Mr. Phasit Lertsincharoenkul Defense counsel revealed that the court had initially examined the evidence. He saw that the case had information, so he accepted the demand and made an appointment to examine the testimony on November 16, in addition, the court will issue a summons to the 7 defendants to examine the testimony. As for the defense of that case, he insisted that a large amount of evidence was prepared. Because the injured person has traveled to report the information at the Lumpini Police Station. In that case, the court has also found and accepted the claim.
However, Mr. Pasit admits that there are still concerns. It is the case that there are many victims of the defendant in this case Residing abroad fears hindering travel to Thailand. Because now there is an epidemic of COVID-19.
[ad_2]
