The “Council” of Wat Jai watches over the people’s constitution project. Is it backwards? (Clip)

When asked if the power of Pracharat was clear that it would accept two big figures, Phaiboon said that it accepted two figures: the first draft of the opposition and the second draft of the government, the rest of the sub-individual section would abstain because it was in Resolving the 253 sections of Sen.

The body of ILaw is the duty of the president. The iLaw draft should be considered by the 7th draft primarily to be provided by the engine. I have explained first But personally I have checked He found that there were many problems in the law, he believed that if the senators did not agree, they could not get 84 votes. By opinion ILaw’s argument is seen as opposed to Drafts 1 and 2, which Drafts 1 and 2 do not resolve the existing 21 sections 1 and 2 as a form of government. That is prohibited by the constitution. That prohibits a proposed motion to change the regime. This motion can be dismissed by law and, more importantly, the problem comes from the people who drafted it. Having problems is not a problem for people

When asked if the evaluation is correct or not, the iLaw body will not be considered tomorrow in Agenda 1, Dr. Chon Nan revealed that if he heard the government that said It will ask for a discussion Political etiquette considered Because the reason has not been explained at all.So, you should listen first. But Paiboon revealed that the draft was unconstitutional. The opposition looked the other way. Because we welcome Because every step of the process If it is contrary to substance This motion would not be implemented and we see it as an intention to exercise the legislative power of the people. Who possesses the power to propose straight laws If we do not support Direct Law Enforcement Mechanisms It will be blocked And finally, the principles that were written in 11 principles turned out to be People have limitations. If the draft can be divided as the deputies would like to do, but they have to sign 50,000 names to propose a law Therefore, asking each of the 50,000 contacts is very difficult. Therefore, it is necessary to integrate the principles. To come in one body, that all 11 Drafts of 11 Principles, there is no draft that indicates that Section 255 and 256 are unconstitutional.

When asked if the assessment is the same or not, the iLaw draft did not raise his hand enough to be brought to the council, Dr. Chon Nan revealed that he was a minority. I need to ask the majority for sympathy However, because the parliamentary system It is a majority sound system But we, who are a minority Announcement of support And fall first Without giving the slightest opportunity He saw that it was the right to exercise direct sovereignty of the town. What is a precarious point in situations like this

If the iLaw draft is not voted on on the second agenda, the question is whether or not it will negotiate with the protesters, Paiboon said is left to the discretion of the members. How did the results come out? If it passes, it passes Do not pass, do not pass personally that the council decided by resolution of the board Not of a single person The assembly must understand Also, the protesters had two sides, so the protesters couldn’t decide.

While Dr. Chon Nan believes it will have a great effect on the atmosphere. But he agreed that the decision to accept or not accept by parliament must be reasonable, but in a majority system. There is very little discretion. To be used in voting Because we use most sound systems When does the party have a resolution? However, the group does not have a resolution accordingly. Therefore, the discretion of the person It is very rare, even senators without political parties. But looking at the origin that has been made as the Senator will have the owner, is it true or not? It’s in the voting result

Second, in your own corner is like pouring oil on a fire. If the parliament will help solve Let everything go to the rhythm Obtaining the best principles And then go to see in detail in Agenda 2, how not You still have time

When asked if there was an opportunity to speak to each other about Agenda 2, Mr. Paiboon said that for him he could not exercise that judgment. Because what you can do is Presentation at the council What is the problem AND show people that you understand why there is a problem. And the problem has to look at the speaker who Write deliberately to have problems. Not just a movement But the writer also has a problem. With allegations of receiving foreign capital Say that it is a base But you still could not find the information What will be a topic that will be discussed in the council Where is this base And the foundation should not get involved in politics, that everything wants you to wait and listen tomorrow

When asked how to propose how good the condition can be done, Dr. Cholanan revealed that he wanted to apply to the majority. Helping to solve the problem of receiving the iLaw body in it is not considered harm at all. In Mr. Paiboon Said he had to speak in detail, he agreed. How the opposition saw How do the proposals see that iLaw is a non-governmental organization that makes the Internet for people a law? For human rights So getting into the proposed law It’s your job, it’s not iLaw

On the issue of content concern, Dr. Cholanan stated that he had 2 problems: the public sector. What was unacceptable to all parties involved was that they viewed the figure as regime change. Another point is that the iLaw draft has several principles. And in relation to many organizations, as to determine the source of the recruitment of independent organizations, some people think it opens the door to bring back Mr. Thaksin and Ms. Yingluck, these concerns are not true. In principle there is no And what you most want to leave is He wants the majority of votes 1. Through 3 drafts, Section 256 is a government draft, an opposition draft and a public draft. 2. He wants to approve the issuance of Section 272 3. The electoral system if it approves these 3 articles with the other 5 organs that will walk in parallel He had different opinions that it was not reversed. That I wish most parties considered

While Mr. Paibul stated that the body of the people The proposed list should be complemented with the advantage that the public joins the name. The rest of the law and the issue here are up to the person who made the motion. That he would blame for that It is the preparation that does not take into account the possibility OR policy What makes people enter their names in vain Unacceptable proposition Because it is unconstitutional AND harassment about sections 1 and 2, after a long discussion, you will see