[ad_1]
February 18, 2016 – Office of the Constitutional Court Publication of news documents indicating that today the Manun State Court that gathered important and interesting cases in the case of the President of the National Assembly asked the constitution to consider the decision in under article 210, paragraph one (2) Duties and powers of the National Assembly. By presenting the draft constitution that modifies the members of the National Assembly in accordance with the Constitution, article 256 (1) (Consideration No. 4/25564) at the 3rd joint meeting of the National Assembly (the second annual session), on Tuesday February 9, 2554 consider an urgent motion in the case of Mr. Paiboon Nititawan, Member of the House of Representatives and Mr. Somchai Sawangkarn, Senator It is proposed to parliament for consideration. Passed a resolution asking the Constitutional Court to consider Duties and powers of the State in accordance with the Department of State, Section 2, paragraph one (2)
As a result of a resolution in said motion that the majority of the state assembly Resolves to submit to the Constitutional Court to hear and rule on issues related to the duties and powers of the National Assembly through a motion. Subsequently, on February 11, 2011, the President of the National Assembly (petitioner) submitted the matter to the Constitutional Court for examination by the State of Manun, article 210, paragraph one (2).
The Constitutional Court examines the facts in accordance with the petition and the supporting documents and considers that the Constitution of article 210, first paragraph (2), establishes that the Constitutional Court has duties and powers to consider problems related to the duties and powers of the House of Representatives. , the Senate, the National Assembly, the Council of State or independent bodies. In which the request must be made In accordance with the provisions of the Constitution, article 210 first paragraph (2) and the Organic Law of Procedures of the Constitutional Court BE2561 (2018), article 44, together with article 7 (2) it will be a problem related to the duties and powers that have already been produced. And in the event that such problems occur with any agency, said body will have the right to submit to the Constitutional Court. When the fact of the petition arises that at the meeting of the National Assembly on February 9, 2011, the National Assembly saw that it was a problem with the duties and powers of the National Assembly and approved a majority resolution to address issues related to to the duties and powers of Parliament to Propose a draft constitution that modifies the members of Parliament to the Constitutional Court for consideration under the Constitution, Section 210, paragraph one (2).
The case is in accordance with the Constitution of article 210 paragraph one (2) together with the Organic Law of Procedures of the Constitutional Court BE2561, article 44, together with article 7 (2), the Constitutional Court orders the consideration of this petition. For the benefit of consideration The relevant persons are Mr. Meechai Ritchupan, Mr. Bowornsak Uwanno, Mr. Somkid Lertphaithoon and Mr. Udomrat Amarit to issue a written opinion on the specified issues, submitting to the Constitutional Court before Wednesday March 3, 2011 and meeting in session. Next time on Thursday March 4, 2011
[ad_2]
