“Surachai” disappointed with study results, no conclusion – innnews



[ad_1]

Parliament Consider accepting principles of constitutional amendments. After a clarification from the Constitutional Amendment Committee before accepting the principle, Mr. Chuan Leekpai, president of the National Assembly, requested cooperation among members who were not in discussion to wear masks. Senator Be the first to argue I was disappointed in the Commission’s study report. Because the report does not have conclusions It is only a two-way opinion that many members Cannot find answers and conclusions that are separated into 2 parts: content and review process. Even the content is good. But if the process is illicit, it will make the draft amendments to the constitution illegal. Therefore, it is proposed to see the constitutional process To be the norm in the future Ready to confirm that It does not intend to block the constitutional amendment.

At the same time, Mr. Surachai argued that he needed a change for the better. But after agreeing there must also be a correct process. To answer that, everyone can decide on the correct principles. Adhere to the principles of constitutional amendments. If the Commission’s response is still not clear enough, it will be accepted only in the case of amendments to Section 3 submissions proposed by the opposition only. Willing to cut off the power Senator elects prime minister And renounces the power to follow up on the country’s reform Accept and do not alter the principle of correctness of the electoral system. Go back to 2 cards to show that the Senate did not block the constitutional amendment. Ready to listen to all the demands And find a way out In addition to asking the members to be free, do not pressure, threaten, intimidate, believe that everyone wants to see a better country. And if you want to configure a Sen. Should vote first in a referendum Along with each section amendment

[ad_2]