Speaking of “Chaiwut-Viroj”, what do people get? After the vote to amend the constitution 30 days



[ad_1]

“Chaiwut” reveals the solution to the draft constitution. “Viroj” Stoke the ruling party responsible for people’s feelings after 30 days of withdrawal

In the case of the parliament meeting on September 24, 2020, there was a majority vote to establish three committees (KMT) to study together before accepting the six constitutional drafting principles, with a study period of 30 days. The opposition party did not present a list of participants.

On September 25, 2020 in direct consultation with Chom Khwan, Mr. Chaiwut Thanakmanusorn, list of deputies People’s Power Party And the government secretary Whip said that in the corner of the Palang Pracharat Party, there was an intention to amend the Constitution.

But if someone after the council meeting will see that there is no Senator who agrees with the constitutional amendment. If there is a resolution, it certainly will not pass. May drop motion to amend constitution Therefore, KMUT has been designated to study first

While Mr. Wirot Lakkhana Adisorn, MP for Kaeng Lai’s party list, said that the 30-day withdrawal did not actually change at all in Agenda 1, he still had to accept the principle of correcting 256 meters to have the deputies. But the main thing is If the time has been delayed, what will be confirmed to happen? How will the coalition government take responsibility for the feelings and hearts of the people?

Now people want clarity. And in the meantime, the opposition party cannot present an amendment to the constitution. It will be presented once between May and September 1964. This delay is not only 30 days, but there are several steps that can be extended several times. The worst is 14 to 15 months.

While Mr. Chaiwut said that he saw the constitution as an important issue to be resolved. As for the exit, look. You may have to talk to the senators, the atmosphere at most meetings. Senators will not agree anyway. And there are those who think that writing the whole issue goes against the referendum of the country’s people or not. Because the constitution is not about one person, it is about all people.

Currently, there are still many groups of people who agree with this constitution. Some would like a referendum to be held before amending the constitution. Including the problems to be solved, it is not clear what problems arise. After solving, what benefit will it bring to people? Personally, if I come to speak to each other, I will be able to find a way out in the next vote.

Mr. Wiroj said that personally, I think there needs to be a backing, like a coalition government committing itself to the people. If it doesn’t pass, it will pull out with the coalition government. Or the ruling party guarantees that if it is not approved, the parliament will be dissolved It must have clear testimonies

Because of the 16.8 million vote referendum that raised so much speech It happened in 2016, and at that time it was in a democratic environment. And don’t worry about having The SSO used to draft a new constitution. However, it should be brought to the council. Including having to make a public resolution. What is the decision-making power of the people anyway?

Mr. Chaiwut further stated that he could not apply for certification. Since voting is a privilege of parliamentarians and senators, all regret that the opposition has not joined the KMT. Personally, they look at two general avenues: 1. Vote on the principles of government. Then come to amend the details in Agenda 2 and 2. There may be a new draft constitution that Senators joined for signing. It is a figure that deputies and senators agree. The new draft may contain certain conditions or requirements that may not match the opposition the Senate added.

Read more …

[ad_2]