[ad_1]
Seping agreed to mediate if Kanchai apologized through the media. The host is not defamatory.
On November 16, 2020, at the Ratchadapisek Road Criminal Court, the court scheduled the examination of evidence. And the testimony of the case Dr. Seping Chaiyasat President of the Face Off Cosmetic Surgery Project How the plaintiff filed a lawsuit Young Kanyakerd’s Stratagem TV host, node stream on channel 3
Mr. Phinyo Phat Chittawan Attorney With victims, surgery victims that came out on the list, all 7 people are charged with publicity defamation. He filed a civil case in connection with a criminal case to claim compensation of 50 million baht as well
Before meeting with court officials, Dr. Seping along with Mr. Jamnong Chaiyamongkol, a lawyer, revealed to the media.
Lawyer Chamnong said earlier: “It is the first appointment and evidence appointment after the Criminal Court has issued an order with Khun Num Karnchai and 7 defendants to arrange an appointment with the evidence to prove how the witnesses will be investigated. What evidence does each part have? If all defendants There will be an appointment of witnesses for the plaintiff and the defendant’s witnesses. “
How sure are you of the evidence?
Lawyer Chamnong: “In lawyer’s language A libelous One There is a real talk on the TV show. Two words are a way to insert Third, what is the intention of the speaker, if there is something good or bad? Why don’t you speak outside? Why do you have to tell people about the matter that it has not been proven to be true or false? In the corner of the test, the plaintiff is not worried about anything. Defamation cases are already a scientific fact. There is already a full list of talks, so you don’t have to worry about anything. “
On the defendant’s part, if the information he is speaking is proven to be true, how will it affect Mr. Seping?
Lawyer Chamnong: “True or not, if it can be proven, it must be seen that some truth is defamatory. This matter, the plaintiff has clear evidence that the matters Not true There are many disputed civil cases.”
Mr. Seping is confident, right?
Dr. Seping: Trusted. Very confident. Our reputation has destroyed us. For people to say something The truth is already in the heart. He wants to trust the jurisdiction Because I believe that justice is true And soon society will have to acknowledge all the facts that Defame me How is it destroying my reputation? I’d like everyone to follow me. “
Today you must meet young Kanchai, how are you prepared to prepare?
Dr. Seping: ”I completely want to see your eyes I want to see feel From the heart we want to see gratitude. People have already hurt other people, there is a feeling in our hearts. “
Have you never met before?
Dr. Seping: “I’ve never met.”
Is there anything you want to say to the 7 defendants?
Dr. Seping: “The actions he had done ruined my reputation over the past two years are almost unhappy. Soon people will know. Society will know and reveal the truth of how I have been defamatory. “
Can a defamation case be reconciled?
Lawyer Chamnong: “Defamation on a clear principle can be discussed and agreed. Asking if you have passed that step Criminal cases have not yet been approved. They can be reconciled at any time. Defamation cases, even if the court has been sentenced, can mediate. “
After this, there will be talk outside of the round. Finding a good solution for both sides?
Lawyer Chamnong: “But the plaintiff and the defendant The plaintiff is the main The court has no power to force mediation. If the plaintiff finds that assuming the defendant feels that what he has done is wrong, he apologizes. That depends. How Will Dr. Seping forgive? Or is there any condition Defamation cases can be settled at any time. In this case, Dr. Seping claimed 50 million baht in damages, as in the civil case, it was up to the plaintiff to dispute the reputation of the damage that occurred “.
Regarding mediation, how much is Dr. Seping allowed?
Dr. Seping: “If everyone could be aware of their own actions In fact, I gave him a lot of time to apologize. I was ready to give a chance a long time ago. If people have done something wrong It has greatly damaged my reputation. If you apologize We Thais can give it a try now. I just want to be aware of what I’ve done wrong. “
What are the conditions for an apology?
Dr. Seping: ”Of course, it destroys our reputation. We have freed people from the media across the country. The apology must be issued through the public. Through the media already“
Young Kunchai Prompt, Mr. Surachet Thong U-chang, a lawyer, told the media. After seeing the court officials saying
Young man: “Postponed today Only that another defendant had to come to the exam It seems that he did not get the mark at all, he had to postpone it on February 22, 64, so today he did nothing I really have to go to the testimony of the defendant case There was a defendant in a foreign country. I still cannot travel due to COVID-19 infection. The other is in Thailand. I sent the order, but it turns out that the order has not been received yet, so I have to postpone it. Because if you do all the exams “
What evidence have we prepared?
Young: “What evidence is needed today? Waiting on the ascendant to retrieve the evidence, I’m pretty sure I didn’t defame anyone. Are you going to mediate? Here it is at the discretion of the court. Depending on Dr. Seping’s side “
Having confronted Dr. Seping, what discussion was there?
Young man: “I did not speak anything. I met you, raised my hand to show you respect. I must say that the list of nodes flows It is a program that is a voice for real people We are never limited Remember which side to take The man who was in trouble He came out because he was the victim.
The work team has been selected to join. They have spoken among us. I myself sat down for the interview. At the end of the show, we were told that he was willing to let the parties come in to clarify. It turns out that after that this point came up. I was also confused. “
Dr. Seping said I want to see this guy today. Do the eyes want to see our fulfillment?
Young man: “Okay. When it comes to looking at me, I raise my hand. Hi. Anyway, I don’t have a point like this. Regarding the realization or not, I still insist that I am not defamatory. Because I have never hated or know Dr. Seping, so why should I defame him? I’d like him to go back and look at the context of the show that day to see if he had any words outside the box until he slandered you. Which I’m sure I don’t have “
I don’t feel guilty, so I don’t apologize?
young : “Do not use the word” without guilt or guilt “. It is better to use the word that I am not defamatory. I insist that I am not defamatory. The point has its origins that are Let’s meet on the court Make everything clear”
Is he himself confident too?
Young: “It’s normal. Those whose demands increase, you must be sure. It is unavoidable. “
But did he say that it can be reconciled?
Young man: “Depending on Dr. Seping, I can be anything. Actually, I am a person who does not like to trade.” If Dr. Seping thinks you want to talk, tell me if you want to talk and I’ll talk.
He told us to apologize through the media. Will you accept that apology?
Young: ”Apology subject Don’t say it, but I’m sorry. Assuming I’m really wrong, I can already apologize to everyone. But what we are not wrong, we have to confirm that we are not really wrong. But everything in the cornerIf I want to go to the show, I’m happy. I never blocked I still said it on the show so I could hear both angles. I’ve been giving the opportunity to be on my show for a long time.
I am happy, not only open today. We open since your partner was on the show. We were told through the program that everyone would come out to know the facts. But currently he has no contact At that time he had contacted that he would come to the program. We ask for information That I will be appearing in the program It turns out that it happens 2 The day to sue him came. I was confused about how. I don’t know how to take it “
If we go on the show, will it be neutral when we party?
Young man: “I am already neutral. This matter I do not stay. I insist that I have nothing to hate, know or dislike, Dr. Seping. I meet his face and raise my hand. If I was feeling insolent, I would walk away, I would not. “
The amount of 50 million that he sued us civilly. Do we think he deserves the damage that he considers destroys his reputation?
Young: “This, I can’t answer. I have to go to court. “
Does the court love you both and warn you that you want to understand each other?
Lawyer Surachet: “The court just wanted to negotiate. The case as long as it has not been investigated The negotiations are already good for both parties, but all seem to be on February 22, 1964. The whole process will continue that day again. Today you just went through the process first. That day must have many facts. “
Our approach to prosecution?
Attorney Surachet: “I have not yet asked for details. The guidelines exist, but now we have to be a bit cautious about what the court will say. “
[ad_2]
