[ad_1]
Dried banana leaf column
Referendum = Cancel the Constitution – The Constitutional Court had a surprise. Green light for parliament “Make a new constitution” but must allow “people with the power to establish the constitution” have to hold a referendum first. Whether you want to have a new constitution or not And when the preparation is complete I had to allow the public to hold a referendum for its approval one more time.
Short decisions With no one seeing the full version Daze In debating another interpretation of the court’s rulings, I was initially puzzled if Congress could still consider drafting a third term of the constitution. Or first you have to go to a referendum AND went through the third term Then go back to do a referendum again, draft, and then go to another referendum
Some people think that Referendum “Ask the people first” opens a channel for the regime to buy time, the voice of the voice for free before electing deputies. Matikim for many more years.
However, if this decision is interpreted progressively That is, the court recognizes that the people are “The constitutional authority” (Pouvoir constituant), therefore, the court to make a referendum that “Want to have a new constitution or not “should have the same meaning. “Do you want to cancel the 2017 constitution?”
That if he wins the referendum, it will have a meaning Deconstitutionalizing the 2017 constitution repeals the constitution prevails by the people who have the founding power. Without having to wait for the blow to take down
The power to establish the constitution in 2017 is the power of a coup. Unfair Use unfair power Forcing a referendum with no option Creating conditions tied by the devil’s technique until there is no solution Therefore, another referendum should mean that “No, I want it. Constitution of Victoria Use it like a handkerchief. Don’t just nod. You can first try a new figure.
So if a referendum Then the public said they wanted a new number. It has to mean that the 2017 constitution has been abolished. It is only used as a “Provisional Constitution” until the new constitution comes into force.
How a family voted to build a new house in the same area It is the same as hitting an old house Just take a few structures to live temporarily, waiting for the new house to be completed.
Therefore, write a new constitution Therefore, it should not be framed by the original constitution. What is the constitution “It has been canceled”
Illustrate Suppose the overwhelming referendum population wins 20 out of 10 million, wants a new version (Whoa), then the drafting process must go through parliament, a third or more 84 senators must agree. You should not edit that category. If so, do I need to do a referendum, etc. or not?
When the Constitutional Court said People have the power to establish And how to return under sub-restrictions
Even the court itself should not have the power to decide the new constitution When it gave the power to establish If you are concerned, the National Assembly has two important principles: “It is a single kingdom. It will be indivisible” and “governed in a democratic system with the King as head of state “(which no one has resolved)
If interpreted according to the decision The court said that Congress has the duty and the power to draft a new constitution. It is the full version of the green light I did not say which category should not be edited as well.
So if it is based on the constitution The people is the founding authority. If the referendum says you want a new constitution, the stalker process must be independent. Safe from the ugly mechanism of the original constitution (that the referendum has been canceled) he will not be able to continue the persecution
Simply put, you don’t have to vote three, you don’t have to depend on 84 senators to go to a referendum. “Annul the constitution of the NCPO” (despite the debate on the power of the Constitutional Court, which is not, it is unlikely that the court will have the power to order a referendum But under the constitution that is full of ups and downs The abolished referendum Scrap the whole problem. Probably the best)
And as soon as the referendum passed Parliament should create only one mechanism to select the building and then all the content so that the building is completed without having to go through Parliament directly to the “power of establishment”.
If important issues are discussed, can you get together to hold a referendum between drafts, for example, would you like to dissolve the Constitutional Court or don’t you want to have a senator?
In fact, the referendum “Would you like to have a new constitution?” Including stipulating basic principles like holding a referendum to ask, Shouldn’t Category 1, Category 2 be modified? The three-fingered mob will lose)
Saying like this is not a concept. Although the court may not think this way. But as you say The people have the power to establish the constitution. And allow the public to hold a referendum first
It is already forced to the referendum It will cancel It will be rejected It will be destroyed Coup Constitution Left only for temporary shelters
If you do a referendum in this sense Will fight by the rules Don’t turn it into a rock game.
[ad_2]
