Read the reviews on the Spaceth.co page, 7 years old, can you really make a spaceship to the moon?



[ad_1]

Read the reviews on the Spaceth.co page, 7 years old, can you really make a spaceship to the moon?

From the case of Prof. (Special) Dr. Anek Lao Thammatat The Minister of Higher Education, Science, Research and Innovation (EGO) made known during the Soon, Thailand will be the fifth nation in Asia to be able to manufacture spaceships and send them to orbit the moon. It is expected to take a period of no more than 7 years.

Click read Anek Lan Thai prepares to become the fifth Asian nation to produce spacecraft in orbit around the moon Expected to take up to 7 years

The latest Facebook fan page Spaceth.co Facebook fan page of the website https://spaceth.co/ The famous space education website has published a message about the news on the subject. “7 Years, Can a Spaceship Really Make the Moon? Thai space is not lacking in technology. But aimlessly”

The content says that
From the news that Dr. Anek Laolthammatat said today without flute that “Thailand will build a spacecraft to orbit the moon in 7 years”, which leads us to question and analyze this dialogue without context.

First question: is it really possible to make a spacecraft orbit the moon in 7 years? The answer is yes. And it’s not difficult, believe it or not, with fierce competition from space in a world where everyone is excited about the 2024 return to moon exploration, Project Artemis has now taken to space on a rocket ship. Send an Orbiter, Lander, or even Rover to land on the moon. It is a scale of work that can be done with the main budget of just one million baht to one hundred million baht only.

At the 2019 (and 2020) IAC conference held online, the global space giant is making significant efforts to develop a payload or lander.

Countries like Israel and SpaceIL are among the most successful examples. They started with a grant from the Google Lunar X Prize project, before coming to the fore with the support of businesses and governments. They sent the lunar lander in 2019, despite not failing. But it shows us that the space in Moon Lander space is not as big as you think

Performing landings in the context of modern competition is not difficult, because in the coming years we will see pilot tests of several landings on the moon. Must be sent On the surface of the moon Orbit on the Moon
So ask the moon took 7 years to land with the national budget, is it possible? I can say that I can and I can.

But the important question is what is it for? It can be a child-like question. What if we ask the space TH what do we do in space exploration? We can also get a response to the Summary that says to explore so that humanity knows itself better. But at the level of government policy implementation (Government Policy), there must be studies and clear goals.

An interesting case study is that of India. India is a country where the majority of the population is still poor. But India is pushing for space technologies (and other technologies, it is clear that India will have its own technology), or it is the case of countries like the United Arab Emirates. A country that seems to have no (laughs) finances, but is also interested in space. Trying to play a role in the workspace In order to Want to declare greatness to the Arab people That the Arabs were once the world leaders in technology The day the Earth goes to explore space, they have to have the same position.

Now let’s take a look at the position of space in Thailand. Thailand does not have a space agency, however we do have an agency like NARIT or the National Institute for Astronomical Research. It was established for 10 years and brings Thai astronomy to the world stage. From participating in various astronomical exploration projects to creating radio signals from space. However, to believe in a cooperative network, NARIT has a clear goal in the area of ​​human development. And there are more concrete plans than to continue with the annual budget

While another active scientific agency, GISTDA, in this area originated in the geospatial field. But later, since it has satellites, it is partially involved in space. As for other government agencies, universities like NSTDA (NSTDA) have frequent cooperation with foreign countries like JAXA, a project to support space activities in Thailand.
However, large-scale cooperation such as the project to the moon It is necessary to look at the common objectives of the government, the private sector, or even the public sector of education in which we will find ourselves. “Common goal” something that, if spoken in a corner of space, Thailand has never had

Despite a project like Thai Space Consortium Project to build satellites and build infrastructure for satellite assembly in Thailand, but we (Space TH) still see it as a collaboration at the scientific agency level (not National Scale integrating educational semesters throughout the country OR that society pay attention to)

We trust the Thai Space Consortium because it will undoubtedly help create quality jobs and people for the Thai scientific community and the global scientific community. But the important question is And at the level of the Ministry of Science (Use the same word) What should I do?

The National Agenda is important. And it should be taken seriously. Not just talk, the media said How many years will Thailand make a satellite? But as a policy maker, we have to convince the public about what we can do, what we do, and how we will benefit.

As from the department We believe that it is important to establish the National Agenda, not the course, because who will do it. It depends on whether the agency can allocate a budget to develop its own expertise according to the How did the “common goal”

Therefore, the Thai spatial development model Therefore, it is not just the work of one agency or two agencies, but it should arise from what we share, our goals and what we do for what society will get. (Although the United States trip to the moon looks beautiful But it still hides a lot of Political Agenda, but in the end, the consequences will decide whether it is worth it or not, because if Apollo complies with the Political Agenda, but does not cause broad development I do not know why)

Therefore, we would like to briefly conclude that “Working in space technology is not difficult. The difficult thing is to optimize the direction with a more limited technology “.

Especially in the context of the Artemis era (and the lunar economy), we should think more than just sending a spacecraft to orbit the Moon and then finish.

How will Thailand race today to keep up with the space economy and space technology? This research has answers: https://spaceth.co/space-industry-and-new-era-of-space … /
Website: https://spaceth.co/
Blockdit: https://blockdit.com/spaceth
Facebook: https://facebook.com/spaceth
Twitter: https://twitter.com/spacethnews
IG: https://instagram.com/spaceth.co



[ad_2]