[ad_1]
“Ramet” vs. “Parinya” raised 6 points, controversial clues, enforcing Section 112
Date November 27, 2020 at 09:26
The NCCC spokesperson responded that “Parinya” raised 6 points in opposition to law enforcement nodes, Section 112
On November 27, 63, Mr. Ramesh Ratanachaweng, Democratic Party Spokesperson As Secretary of the Party Law Committee He mentioned the case that Mr. Prinya Devanritikul Vice President of Sustainability and Administration of Rangsit Center Thammasat University Has commented in the Section 112 that Master Prinya’s opinion may confuse society that If the application of the law, Section 112, then there will be problems with the group of people who want to reform the institution. That is why it is necessary to have a contradictory opinion To see the beginning
1. Principles of article 112 of the Penal Code With the essence that whoever defames, insults or slanders the King, the Queen, the apparent Heir or the Regent It will be punished with imprisonment from three to fifteen years.
Status of this section of the law Still in force Have a clear prevention intention so there are no intentional people. Declare with false statements Against the King or with contempt or malice
2. The fact that it happened It was clear that Both actions are verbally Draw ads Looks like a violation, Section 112, all when it looks like a violation. Even if no one reported there is no other way to strictly prosecute the authorities who witnessed such an action.
3. If the police Failing to fulfill their duties Should be held guilty of refraining from performing duties.
4. The country will be calm. If the law is strictly enforced If you break the law, but you think the group has a lot of people. If there are legal proceedings, these people will get mad. It will make the country chaotic and not peaceful. If so, there should be no law. All laws must be repealed. And let everyone do what they want
5. I think it is not necessary for lawyers to tell you that you are wrong or wrong. But everyone can see that That happens today Guilty or not Go beyond using rude and inappropriate language
6. Whoever said it can cause problems among the people who demanded the reform of the monarchy. With more and more monarchy enforcing Section 112, I believe law enforcement is causing problems. It was considered in violation of the principles of the state law that governs. Why don’t you fear that the problem will arise with the people in the prison where they have committed some other crime? Because he was in prison, it was completely an act of law enforcement. People in society don’t think in such a drastic way. Because nothing can escape the principle of correction. It may not satisfy anyone. But that’s something that lasts. And support law enforcement Under the rule of law
[ad_2]
