[ad_1]
“Rames”, see Section 112, is not contrary to or incompatible with the rule of law and the constitution. But resist those who think badly against the institute Confirms Democratic opposition to cancel Ready to support strict enforcement of the law
On December 11, 2020, Mr. Rames Ratanachaweng, spokesman for the Democratic Party Cited in the case of protesters calling for the abolition of Article 112 that the Democratic Party adheres to the democratic regime of government with the King as Head of State. And a country governed by law A demonstration calling for democracy But what is the real intention? Believe that society knows. The purpose of using speech to protest against Thai institutions is unacceptable. More recently, Section 112 will be repealed. Everyone is well aware of the protesters’ intentions that Section 112 is an obstacle to the main purpose of the assembly.
Outstanding news
Principles of article 112 of the Penal Code that this article of the law requires. Be in line with the protection of the institutionalized monarch as head of state of Thailand The imposition of penalties on offenders is for public order and good customs according to the rule of law which is moral. Or the ethics of the law
Therefore, Article 112 is neither contrary nor incompatible with the rule of law. And it is not unconstitutional. But those who think badly of the institution resist. Therefore, he raised this question in order to repeal the application of this article “
Mr. Rames further stated that despite the fact that Article 112 of the Penal Code stipulated in the first category of crimes related to the security of the Kingdom, Chapter 1, crimes against the King, the Queen, the apparent Heir and the Regent . He What is a state measure that aims to protect the monarchy From defame, insult or show malice The crime of section 112 of the Penal Code would have an impact on the security of the state. Because the King is an institution that the constitution provides, endorses and protects It is part of the democratic regime of government with the King as head of state of Thailand.
However, article 112 is the provision of the law on the security of the Kingdom. It is a generally used arrangement. It is not intended to apply to any particular case or person. And it does not affect the essence of the free speech of the constitution in any way. Because everyone still has the freedom of expression within the scope of the penal code, article 112.
“Section 112 is not a problem as the protesters distort. By inviting MPs to enter their names to propose amendments to Section 112 to the House of Commons, but any political party that wants to do so cannot be banned. Division of the Democratic Party We have a clear principle: Adhere to a democratic regime of government with the King as Head of State And there is no concept to abolish Article 112, we strongly support the application of the law. “
Read more …
