[ad_1]
Monday, March 1, 2021, 10:07 p.m.
“Jay Noi” feared people frustrated with amending the Constitution once again. After the power side tried to create a miracle, stop the amendment, “Phongthep” declared to high-level voters. To draw better than the year 60, “Bhokin” pointed out that if the constitution cannot be solved, it is equivalent to protecting the power of the coup.
March 1, 2021 Khunying Sudarat Keyuraphan, Chairman of the Thai Building Group Said in a dialogue “Through the Arhat checkpoint Stop the process of breaking the people’s constitution” by asking questions Why did the coup break the constitution? So it’s easy to do and never go wrong. But when people go to amend their constitution it becomes difficult, since society is in a moment of being deceived by hope. As in the 2017 constitution, the authorities asked to go ahead and hold a referendum. To have a choice
“The government is playing on two pages, creating again the hope that it will get a new constitution. But in the end, the people will not be the constitutional amendments, but the dictatorship and dictatorial senators will amend the new constitution. To gain the upper hand and become stronger for some MPs throwing their power at others to judge. It is a very shameful thing. Never seen since I worked in politics for 29 years. Are there any members of Congress who have this kind of shameful behavior? So, It is not strange that many sectors of society ask that question. Why do older people have it? “
Khunying Sudarat also calls all parties In particular, the Constitutional Court together to find a way out for the country Do not make the country a stalemate For the little people They are in serious trouble The game that the oligarchs are playing No one will win the country, lose the people, therefore ask the Constitutional Court to make a decision in the interest of the people. And there should be a decision before the vote on agenda 3
Pongthep Thepkanjana, a former Minister of Justice, stated that the 2017 constitution does not have any clause stating that the new version cannot be drafted. It simply prohibits changing the shape of the state and the regime. Therefore, having to question whether If it is forbidden to draw a complete copy, why is it not specified? Or if there are amendments to every section except for specific forms of the state Including the form of government How is it different from the outline of the whole issue?
How will the Constitutional Court decide? Mr. Phongthep saw that the Constitutional Court understand that the parliament will vote on agenda 3 and will have enough time for the Constitutional Court. Full Diagnosis Before Parliament can vote on Agenda 3, which Mr. Phongthep Believes that the Constitutional Court will understand the need. Otherwise, it is a concern. And I think that regardless of the electoral system, what will the deputies be like? But MPs who can be trusted AND able to draw better than in the past (year 2017) and ultimately the people will be the judge because if MPs lurk they are not good enough The public would vote against. To create a new constitutional process
Phokin Pholkul said he was concerned that the draft revised constitution will not pass the third term, which has been moving forward to amend the constitution for a long time. Since Constitution 2540, it has come from the people. And it is considered one of the best constitutions in the country. However, from the political crisis Continued for more than 10 years, it is necessary to ask all parties to cooperate To make amendments to the constitution Can move forward in the process Pulling the country out of a dead end Promote the creation of a constitution by the people. And approved by the public
In this regard, Mr. Phokin opined that the case in which the senators and senators filed a petition to the Thammu State Court for a ruling That the constitutional amendment can be fixed or not. You will have to wait for the Constitutional Court When you will be diagnosed If Parliament has approved Agenda 3, it will go through a referendum process. In which, if the Constitutional Court ruled after Agenda 3 that the development of a new constitution cannot be done. As a result, the government, together with the Senator, can solve any problem. And it will solve problems that are beneficial to the government. Because the opposition has no jurisdiction with the government and more STS.
For the draft constitution that is approved in terms 1 and 2 of the parliament now It did not touch sections 1 and 2, which in the past had happened. He considered that if the constitutional amendment could not write it, it would protect it. Power of the dictatorship
While Mr. Yingcheep Achjanon from “iLaw” agreed with the election of the 200 senators, in the case of using the constituency of 1 district 1 district, 200 districts, 200 people, it is surprising. And believe there will be many more problems
[ad_2]
