[ad_1]
Friday, November 13, 2020, 6:00 am
‘Chuan’ supports the interpretation
Waiting for the amendment to the Constitution. November 17-18.
Vishnu believes that the process does not stumble.
Better than submitting after a referendum.
“Chuan” reiterated the resolution of the tripartite meeting to consider only the draft amendment to the Constitution, November 17-18, the group requesting the council resolution to present the interpretation of the constitutional amendment or not When entering the council after the November 18, Vishnu noted that interpret the clues to amend the constitution. SSO is better than presenting an interpretation after holding a referendum You can save 30 days. Supports the coalition party draft Constitutional ‘Somkid’ strikes war. Do not think about reforming the constitution after sealing the interpretation of time while ‘Yo Ley’ has reiterated the position of annulling the ’20-year strategic plan’
On November 12 in Parliament, Chuan Leekpai, Speaker of Parliament, spoke about the progress made by Phaiboon Nititawan, the list of deputies. The Palang Pracharat Party and Somchai Sawangkarn, Senator, called on parliament to pass a resolution to submit three constitutional amendments to the Constitutional Court. To determine if it is against the law or not
Reiterate discussion of clues to submit performances after November 18.
By reiterating that on November 11 last we discussed with the three-party meeting whether you would like to have a normal meeting or not, if necessary, we had to put the agenda according to the issues that came in order. Such as matters that the Commissioner has considered concluded, etc. But because the tripartite meeting agreed that only the Constitution should be presented and reiterated that from November 17 to 18, it will contain only the issues that the Commissioner has considered. And draft amendments to the constitution The motion of Mr. Paiboon And the draft of the Voting by Referendum Law Will be packed after November 18.
The speaker of Parliament said that the procedure for voting or not accepting the principles of the draft amendments to the 2017 constitution that the constitution required a third or 84 votes to be approved by the senator. Parliamentary staff will also analyze the process of counting points, establish the privilege To see how many members of the Senate there are If we count all together, it will be difficult to count. And, for example, if you count more than 700 people, you will split the score between the Senator and the Senator. There may be a problem. So try to make it special State it clearly and for the convenience of scrutiny. Because after the vote, the officials have to recount the votes, it can take time.
Wissanu noted that he did not fix the constitution to stumble.
Deputy Prime Minister Witsanu Krea-ngam, the Deputy Prime Minister for Legal Affairs, spoke about the case of criticism that the government was not sincere in amending the constitution. Because the government deputies AND some senators presented an interpretation that the Constituent Assembly (Sen. Ror.) Unconstitutional that this matter is difficult to talk about Because the constitutional amendment project belongs to the parliamentarians, not the government If the deputies and senators have doubts It will present that interpretation. Already said in principle. Don’t stumble into the process. From what they looked, they didn’t stumble. Because you considered not doing it now. Do it in the future, it may be too late to figure it out. Or there will be damage like holding a referendum and it will be even worse
One pointer can save 30 days.
“I suppose he might have good intentions. Because not a day I have to send it now because sending it now can save more time. It is mandatory if a referendum is finished, because article 256 of the Constitution states that if there is a member of Parliament The suspect has the right to be admitted to the court within 30 days, if he appears now he can save 1 month, up to then, you may not have to submit it. If there is something now I can still fix it on time Better to solve under the condition of not stumbling because it does not stumble on anything, because from November 17 to 18 an agenda is voted, if it is approved, it takes about 1 month. Yes at that time Sent to the Constitutional Court to complete the matter and went to court. If the court does not interrupt, the process is over. He waited for the referendum process, but had to wait for the Act referendum. Yes, it was expected to be in February next year and confirmed that if the court accepted the matter, the parliamentary process would not stop, “said Wissanu.
Confirm the battle. Support the recruiting party to join the constitution.
When asked if I can confirm that the government pushed to amend the constitution, Wissanu said, yes, at least the draft of the coalition government. But he did not dare to mention another subject.
When asked if there was a possibility that the Constitutional Court would not accept the consideration because the matter had not yet occurred, Mr. Wissanu said there was a possibility. Because he presented according to the regulations of the 31st Congress, which is not necessarily contradictory. It is a question of doubt about the authority of the city council, there are many that the court does not accept. In the past, the government had sent to discuss it and it refused. In the days of Mr. Chuan Leekpai as Prime Minister, the court said that the matter was not yet born, the court was not a legal adviser. If you want to know, you have to ask the Council of State.
When asked if the court did not accept the accident, it would be criticized later, Witsanu said if the court rules were not acceptable. Could not accept As if there was an incident but the incident did not happen, the court did not accept it, but when there was a subsequent incident, it could not be sanctioned because the rule was like that. So we have to see if the court accepts it or not. When asked whether it is expected or not, in addition to the issue of the interpretation of the deputies, it will be interpreted that the referendum In case there is before or after the adoption of the constitutional principle, Wissanu said that the draft that he presented now contains such issues. Because if you ask just state or not, the court would not accept it.
‘Somkid’ starts the battle: the Senate eliminates time to resolve the Constitution.
Mr. Somkid Chuakong, MPs Ubon Ratchathani Pheu Thai Party and Vice Chairman of the Coordinating Committee of the Opposition Coalition Said the motion to amend the constitution, including parliamentarians, Palang Pracharat Party together with Senators (senators) will submit to the Constitutional Court to decide whether a motion to amend the constitution. From the opposition party under Section 256 if it is contrary to or incompatible with the 2017 constitution In which the council was held Follow the steps on the agenda As to whether there is a problem in the commission, or will we have to wait for it the court decides. It is the technique of law to take the time to amend the government constitution. Not fit for General Prayut. He told the government to rush to amend the constitution. It was just a passing talk.
Warn
Somkid said that the government must be honest with the people. It should not allow the deputies and senators to come to proceed The government will claim that the order cannot be believed, because past behavior indicates that the government Able to order a senator The situation of government protests It is advisable to remove the wood from the fire . But the government did the opposite, pouring oil on the fire, which did not benefit all parties.
“In the event that General Prawit Wongsuwan, Deputy Prime Minister as Chairman of the Strategy Committee The Palang Pracharat Party would say that it would not be possible because its members were on the list of large numbers. The party will be responsible or not. I can’t say I warn you with the good hope that the congressmen who have entered the list should think carefully. You must not create the conditions that lead to conflict in Thai society any more. Because it doesn’t benefit the country, ”Somkid said.
NACC supports constitution / does not touch category 1-2.
Mr. Chaichana Dejdecho, MP from Nakhon Si Thammarat Democratic party Mentioning actions to reform party constitution which Encouraged the constitution to be amended from the beginning because it was an important condition from the beginning to join the Party government. Until the government agrees to include one of the government policies in the administration of state affairs since the government policy announcement in 2019, but he sees that the amendments should make all parties feel comfortable because some of the contents of the constitution clearly state that the amendments do not. Yes, editing without touching Category 1 and Category 2 is the best way to fix it. And it doesn’t affect most people’s feelings, either.
Victory said there were some concerns that the constitutional amendment was to the benefit of politicians. He insists that in some of the articles on rights and freedoms, there are still flaws that the people still cannot fully exercise the rights Before amendments can be made, there must be a public referendum that Agree or disagree, that’s why asked the public Believe that this amendment to the Constitution Is for the benefit of real people.
‘I Law’ halts 20-year strategic plan
While the Internet for Public Law Project or “Ilaw” posted a message on social media, iLaw confirmed the offer to cancel the “20-year Strategic Plan”, stating that Constitutional Reform Project Issues proposed by the public Prepared for consideration by Parliament on November 17, 2020, it is a draft with the most comprehensive proposals to resolve existing political problems, one of which is the annulment of the “20-year Strategic Plan” and the “National Reform Plan.” That just happened for the first time. Even the names of these plans sound beautiful. But behind both authors Approval enacted And the interpreter applies It was the entire body of the NCPO.
The “National 20-Year Strategy” or, rightly, the “NCPO Strategy” is another theme of the 2017 constitution that should be amended or repealed. Although the government of the National Council for Peace and Order (NCPO) emphasizes the importance of the national strategy that will be the key to developing the country for continuity But shortly after the adoption in 2018 it became clear that this national strategy Unable to protect to the country of crises “
[ad_2]
