‘Piyabutr’ backed down ‘permanently’ using the old policy, hung up the institution, using Section 112 does not help.



[ad_1]

November 26 20 – Mr. Piyabut Saengkanokkul, Secretary General of the Faculty of Progress Post a message via Facebook Than Piyabutr noted, Thavorn used the old joke to attack behind the mafia and had the idea to subvert the institution, reflecting 3 things, insulting the young – not ready for change – using the old politics to hang the institution, claiming loyalty and wearing the pendant. 112 does nothing better

Yesterday at the Faculty of Political Science Chulalongkorn University Piyabutr Saengkanokkul Secretary General of the Faculty of Progress Interviewed about the case that Thavorn Seniam, Vice Minister of Transport, accused Thanathorn Chuengrungruangkit The president of the Faculty of Progress and Piyabut Saengkanokkul were behind the assembly from students. Students, students and the public, including those who accuse them of the idea of ​​abolishing the monarchy.

Piyabutr said that in terms of hearing clarifications and giving his information permanently. He felt that this was not a new matter. But the allegations that have been found only in the establishment of the Future Forward Party Looking for evidence that is their academic document And an interview from Khun Thanathorn Bring all the links In which cases like this have been linked before, that is, Nathaporn Toprayoon, who has filed with the Constitutional Court, he called the Illuminati case. But the court ultimately dismissed the case.

Piyabutr said that his press conference is permanent this time. Slander Clearly considered defamatory, but personally in the past, I was patient in the use of laws like this. Because they believe in freedom of expression And believe that if it is false, people will be able to decide for themselves who to believe, however, their speech is permanent during this period. It is said during the meeting of the Popular Party Speaking during the local elections I can’t help but think about what this way of thinking reflects. That must have 3 elements that are

1. Reflecting on a group of people who did not keep up. Insulting the future youth of the nation Look with old glasses, as in the Cold War, that there must be someone behind.

2. Reflect fear I am not ready for change with the new world, I don’t know how to deal with So, use the method to delude yourself and continue to feel comfortable

3. Reflecting on the old destruction, using old jokes drawing the monarchy as a tool to attack the other side. Despite the demands of the assembly Reform the monarchy to remain democratic.

“So far, whether you like it or not But I must admit that the requirements for the reform of the monarchy Has been brought to the table The only way to find a way out Is listening Speak maturely The repression does not improve anything. The application of the article 112 of the Penal Code does not improve anything. I can only console myself that it can be managed This is an old political alliance. Who does not know how to think of a policy to compete And besides, instead of going to find out who was behind the rally I want to the people who gave the coup Government of succession And all those who support He picked up a mirror and looked at himself and thought that he could have found the reason why people could come to the assembly, “Piyabutr said.

[ ไม่ได้ขึ้นอยู่ว่าใครเป็นกรรมการปรองดอง แต่อยู่ที่เนื้อหาและขอบเขตการทำงาน ]

The reporter asked if a reconciliation committee would be established. And Thanathorn Piyabutr was nominated to join this committee. Piyabutr said that in the past, there have been many reconciliation committees. This time too. For me The main thing is that it is not who feels like director. But it must be a question of content AND the scope of this work In particular, there are 3 important questions

1. General Prayut Chan-o-cha resigned and passed to a new government peacefully.

2. Drafting of a new constitution

3. Reform of the monarchy

What, if you intentionally ignore any of the above? This committee will be like the above. It’s just a report. Not being used. So it doesn’t matter if he or Thanathorn will be in the director or not. But where is this claim disputed?

“I said it many times. That it doesn’t have to be me Because the content that needs to be discussed the three of us is already in public. Do the judges intend to do this? That when you saw the structure of the directors you only found a group of people attacking the protesters It will take these people or they will become reconcilers Because whether they are government deputies, if they are opposition deputies, if they are senators, they all have the same set of ideas linked to the succession to power of the NCPO. That is why I was afraid that he would become the one to frame what could be said. What story cannot speak Which we thought would not create an atmosphere to speak at all, “Piyabutr said.



[ad_2]