[ad_1]
Phaiboon – Pracharath Power breaks the Democratic motion Who wanted to submit to the Constitutional Court for the second round, “Chada” with Thai pride did not join the Board of Joke.
On March 17, 2021, journalists reported to Parliament in a joint session of the National Assembly with Chuan Leekpai, Speaker of Parliament and Speaker of the House of Representatives. Serving as President Provided an opportunity for Members of Parliament to comment on Constitutional Court rulings. On the agenda for the discussion of the meeting Before entering the agenda to consider the constitutional reform project (No.
Senators and senators alike made various comments at the meeting. And a motion is presented to the meeting to pass a resolution of 3
1. Yatti Sr. Somchai Sawangkarn, Sen. and Mr. Seri Suwannaphanont, Sen. 3, Topic 1. Somchai Seri, approved the meeting not to consider voting on the draft constitution for Program 3 because it is contrary to the decision. Constitutional Court 4/2021
2. Request the National Assembly to approve a resolution requesting the Constitutional Court to decide its duties and powers. According to Constitution 210 (2) it is a motion proposed by Mr. Jurin Laksanawisit, leader of the Democratic Party.
That it has a coalition of government parties like the Bhumjaithai Chart Thai Pattana Party Commenting on supporting that the vote should be postponed on agenda 3 and then going to find the law clearly
3. A motion to advance on agenda item 3 of Mr. Rangsiman Rome, MP, advance party list In accordance with the motion proposed by Dr. Chol Nan Srikaew, MP Nan, Pheu Thai Party, with parliament to act as parliament to vote on agenda 3
Mr. Chuan revealed that throughout the day there were 43 members of the discussion and presentation of the matter. By decision of the Central Constitutional Court There are conflicting opinions, even the senators who seem unified I still have different opinions In addition to a coalition government And the opposition parties do not see the same thing. And the result of a parliamentary attorney who was concerned that Congress could mislead court rulings. But we have the right to freedom of expression.
“Will we break the resolution of the Constitutional Court? Please, do not worry. If we are wrong in good faith, our opinion is more likely to be correct. It is a right that members can practice ”
After a nine-hour debate, no conclusion has been reached on a motion to be voted on by Parliament. Until Mr. Chuan had to order a 20-minute suspension of the meeting
Later, at 8:47 pm Paiboon Nititawan, list of MPs People’s Power Party Propose a motion in accordance with the regulations of the 32nd Congress to proceed according to the urgent agenda. (Draft Amendment to the Constitution (No. But there were voices protesting whether to make the previously proposed motion fall or not. Because he saw that it would be a vote on Agenda 3
Then, Mr. Chuan stated that the change in urgent motion to consider instead of the agenda for recognition. At the same time, the National Assembly had approved 473 votes to 127 votes, 39 votes and 5 abstentions, causing the previously proposed motion to fall.
Causing Mr. Chada Thaiset, MP, Uthai Thani From the Bhumjaithai Party said: “I am not asking to join the fight with the Sri Thanonchai scammers. This is the Board of Joke. “
[ad_2]
