[ad_1]
Permanent Secretary Mae Rim notes that the “Bint” case accepts donations – requests help in the flood, similar to the “Sean” case, accepts donations to help wildfires, identifies 3 offenses for not asking permission to donate. The public fraud network is wrong with the Communications Act.
At 09:30 AM on November 3, at Mae Rim Police Station, Chiang Mai Province, Mr. Boonyarit Nipavanich, Undersecretary of Mae Rim, brought evidence to meet with Lieutenant Colonel Khajon Ruen Kham, Inspector for the investigation To make the case of the famous life coach of Mr. Sean Burana Hiran Open for donations to help volunteers to extinguish the forest fires of Doi Suthep Without permission Fraudulent persons Violated by the Computer Law to compose said case, more than 2 hours
Lieutenant Colonel Kachorn said additional questioning To concise the expression of the case Able to prosecute in accordance with the legal process If idioms are complete Report the charges to the accused respectively
Mr. Boonyarit said Mr. Sean AND those who were prosecuted Has not found any investigating officer from Mae Rim Police Station, officer may issue summons to meet To provide evidence to accompany case If unable to come , you can issue an arrest warrant. In which the case of Mr. Sean Considered a successful case Because he received donations or requested more than 1.4 million baht, but did not bring to help as a volunteer. After examining the account, it was found that more than 1.3 million baht has been used for misuse.
Mr. Boonyarit mentioned famous actor and social worker Bint Bun Luerit. Open for donations or requests Helps people suffering from disaster And those suffering from social problems are similar to the case of Mr. Sean. Preliminary check I found no donations or application requests. It was then found that there were more than 422 million baht donors, that Mr. Bint and his group brought donations to help the 5,000 baht per person flood victims, but there were complaints requesting an audit of the donations. Reporting to Muang Ubon Ratchathani Police Station as evidence That staff have coordinated To request information on what was said also
“According to the law, to request donations or solicitations, you must first ask the authorities for permission. With a receipt For donors to keep as proof with a check to confirm how much donation it is AND make income and expense accounts as proof Will Affirm bring cash to victims Unable to show evidence As is known, some donations have been used for misuse, such as purchasing supplies Repair of the house or for personal use Considered in breach of said donor objective If requesting permission to receive donations in the past, he cannot do it because he did not follow the legal steps. And the failure was considered successful, “said Boonyarit.
Boonyarit said that if you compare Mr. Bint’s case with Mr. Sean, it is no different. Because it accepts donations without permission. It is a misappropriation or public fraud and it is against the Computer Law. But create more damage value. Because there are many donors. Personally, I am not overwhelmed. Or worry about Mr. Bin’s case Because following his authority Ready to cooperate with staff And take Mr. Sean’s case As a guideline for dealing with Mr. Bint’s case To the same standard
[ad_2]
