[ad_1]
Image file
December 3, 2020 – The correspondent reported that on December 2, 2020 at the Don Mueang District Court, the Court convened the declaration of the Black case No. 1124/2563 at the Public Ministry. The Special Prosecutor’s Office, Case 9 of the District Court, is the plaintiff who sues Mr. Prit Chivarak or Penguin, the leader of the Popular Group, as accused of the crime, he did not notify the public assembly with the local official in accordance with the law . Not less than 24 hours before the start of the rally, interfere with the performance or use of public services by contacting the government, obstructing public traffic, using a wireless microphone amplifier. In a speech at a public meeting Without permission
The plaintiff demanded that from 7 to 8 August 2020 on the night before noon The defendant and the group that organized the public assembly Jointly organized the public assembly There were between 150 and 200 people gathered in front of the Bang Khen police station , Anusawaree Sub-district, Bang Khen District, Bangkok. Audience AND the defendant and the gang took turns speaking using a political point of view amplifier. Show dissatisfaction with the work of the judicial system. In the case that Mr. Anon Nampha and Mr. Panupong Chadnok were arrested by the police Show dissatisfaction with the work of the government. The defendant did not inform the public assembly with the local official in accordance with the law. Not less than 24 hours before the start of the assembly, the entrance and exit of the Bang Khen police station caused people to report suffering. Interfering with job performance or use of public services by contacting the government. And obstruct the traffic of people In general, travel to and from said place. And use a wireless microphone amplifier In a speech at a public meeting Without permission
Request punishment under Public Assembly Law BE2558 (2015), Section 4, 8 (1), 10, 27, 28 of the Advertising Law using the amplifier. Year 2593 Section 3, 4, 9 Road Traffic Law BE2522 Section 4, 114, 148 Road Traffic Law (No. 7) BE2550 Section 8 Road Traffic Law (No. 12), 2019, Section 5, Penal Code, Sections 83, 91, 368
At 10:00 in the morning, the defendant did not appear in court. But he appointed a lawyer AND file a petition to postpone the case Because the university sets today as Thammasat University exam day Instead, the court considered and allowed to postpone the appointment for testimony on January 18, 2021 at 9 : 00 am
[ad_2]
