‘Parina’ does not care, NCCC accuses false accounts – unethical invasion of the forest Ready to send a notice on 10 September.



[ad_1]

8 September 20 – In Parliament, Miss Parina Kraiyakup, MP from Ratchaburi, Pracharath Party Announcing the case of NACC reporting allegations, reporting false asset and liability accounts AND the case of ethical violations for invasion of the National Forest which is not concerning , ready to clarify the allegations to the NACC. Have documents ready Several pieces of evidence have already been clarified to the NACC. Everything has evidence ready to clarify, as the NCCC suspects the loan of 7.7 million baht that the debtor has refused to borrow. You have proof in a loan letter. The case is currently being sued in court. NCCC can see only one angle But I did not see all the evidence Which is why it thought it had no status as a true creditor While the question of the price of Phra Somdej Bang Khunprom, the price of 2.5 million baht, confirms that it is the property that share the property of the ex-husband, the price of 2.5 million baht is the price reported by the ex-husband. Therefore, she reported the price by NACC as specified by the ex-husband Because she had no knowledge of monks This is not the issue of commercial price manipulation. Confident, able to clarify to the NACC on every issue

Thosaphon Pengsom, an attorney, Miss Parina, said there were two counts of allegations reported by NACC to Miss Parena, the first being reporting false asset and liability accounts. It is: 1. I do not believe that Miss Parina is actually a creditor of 7.7 million baht because the debtor has denied that I did not borrow money from Miss Parina In this case, there is clear evidence such as a loan letter. The matter is in the process of processing. 2. The price of Phra Somdej Bang Khun Phrom 2.5 million baht obtained from the former husband. Miss Parina informed the NACC with the price indicated by her ex-husband. 3. The False Land Possession Notification, Chapter 5, for 58 parcels, confirms that the false ownership account has not been reported to the NACC. Ready to explain to NCC that Terreno p. 5 There are 29 parcels, not 58 parcels, the remaining 29 parcels, if compared, will be the same as 29 physical parcels, but reported to 58 parcels due to misunderstanding by the accounting department in filing property accounts Submit all documents without know that there is a duplicate list of terrains in the same list, confirming that there is no impersonation of other terrains to report.

Thosapon said the second count, the ethical breach report. We are checking that NCCC reports charges of serious misconduct in any category Because there are general and serious ethics In order to prepare evidence to fight both charges, we are not concerned, we are only concerned with the unethical issue of wrongdoing. In this case, on September 10, a letter will be sent to the NACC to clarify the accusations first in 2 numbers, in the case of a loan of 7.7 million baht and the price of the amulet that has prepared evidence to solve all the accusations. ya As for the land, p. 5 In the process of gathering additional evidence to clarify the NACC. And the issue of ethical conduct is still being considered. Will NACC clear up any ethical violation issues? Ms. Parena was ready to clear up all the allegations.



[ad_2]