[ad_1]
On October 6, the reporter reported that on October 5 at the Criminal Court on Ratchadaphisek Road He has read the verdict on black case No. O 723/2563, Colonel Pajapon Rod Pho Thong, Ph.D., Police Station Lat Lum Kaeo, Pathum Thani Province, is the plaintiff suing Mr. Khiri Rak Samana Baramee or Mitchai, the famous heroic brother. A-Chaiya Mitrchai’s man was accused of falsely prosecuting others in court for committing a crime. Under the Penal Code, Section 175 for the case on March 27, 60 in Bangkok Criminal Court, the defendant has presented a false accusation to the plaintiff. That by committing a criminal offense on the extraction of goods under the Penal Code, Section 338 demanded that the plaintiff force the plaintiff to sign the loan agreement and the debt settlement agreement of 35,500,000 baht, where the defendant knew that the plaintiff did not commit a crime. But sue the court so that the plaintiff faces criminal penalties. After the court sold the system’s case. Because the plaintiff has filed a lawsuit.
It later appeared under the judgment of the Pathumwan District Court that the defendant made the agreement voluntarily. It was not caused by threats or coercion in any way. The defendant removed from the criminal case for extraction of goods is not provoked by the defendant in exile. Because the accused accepts the condition of the crime of false report and withdraws the case for the crime of extraction of property from the plaintiff’s evidence. This is because it is the same fact as the case where the plaintiff sued the defendant in the Thanyaburi Provincial Court. To judge that the defendant had committed a crime AND the contract made by the defendant was not due to violation or threat to the defendant defendant for a crime of extraction of goods. Not for the conviction of the defendant It is not a reason for the court to punish less than what is stipulated by law or not to punish at all. And for the benefit of the defendant’s own claim. Otherwise, the defendant can be sued to be liable for another act of perjury. Because the defendant in this case is the same person as the defendant in criminal case no. 4727/2559 of the Thanyaburi Provincial Court and red case no. 118/2563 of the Pathumwan District Court. With prison sentence Therefore, he asked the court to count the prison sentence in this case after said criminal case.
The court has considered the evidence. Convicted Defendant Guilty Under the Penal Code, Section 175 sentenced to 2 years in prison, but defendant pleaded guilty for the sake of consideration. There is a justification Halving the sentence according to article 78 of the Penal Code, one year in prison will continue from criminal case number Red No. 4727/2559 of the Thanyaburi Provincial Court and Criminal case No. 118/2563 of the Court of Pathumwan District.
Related news
Mystery of love ?? ‘friend-businessman’ 35 million or for love
Mitr Mitrchai has already found the police. He acknowledged around 35 million fraud charges.
6 years in prison for Mitrchai fraud – order to return 27 million. Submit a bond of 3.5 million
The superintendent takes his wife to the Sheriff’s Division Inform the prosecution of Likay Mitr on the brink
[ad_2]
