One step forward, older people threaten: negotiate, amend the constitution for agenda 3, the other party contradicted their own ideas



[ad_1]

One step forward, older people threaten: negotiate, amend the constitution for agenda 3, the other party contradicted their own ideas

February 25, 2021 at 9:00 p.m.

“Thirajchai” compressed by Sen. Extortion after bullying – lobbying through the whip to revoke the Constitution in 3 ways.

February 25 in the National Assembly. What did the draft constitution that modifies the second term consider? On the process of consideration and drafting of the constitution What the Commissioner (KMT) has reviewed the content for the deputies? It has the power to appoint a senator to assume the position of commissioner to write the constitution. Or considering a draft constitution AND determined to create a person who is not a deputy. May be another commissioner With conditions to take into account knowledge and experience OR experience By majority of 565 votes, in agreement with the commissioner by 1 vote, abstaining 20 votes

After that, the meeting considered the article on after the draft constitution was completed. Present to the National Assembly To discuss and express opinions without voting to be completed within 30 days and when it is considered finished, the draft constitution will be submitted to the Electoral Commission – Vote in referendum within 7 days.

With controversial issues To the authorization of Parliament Vote approval or disapproval before voting in a referendum, which the Senate wants the parliament to vote before leading to a referendum. To achieve a check and balance, which Mr. Somchai Sawangkarn, Sen., debates that the case does not pass the parliament It is not a responsible democracy. The drafting of the constitution in 240 days or 8 months is urgent and without framework, so it is necessary to check and balance. Before the referendum

While dissidents like Teeraj Chaipuntumas, MPs, the party list, the commission should take the most promising steps when discussing which Referendum Transcending parliament So that the people have the right to establish the constitution Why interrupt However, the current parliament No. 100 % of the public because a certain number They are appointed by the National Council for Peace and Order (NCPO) and are likely to hinder For a moment, there was a behavior of negotiating if not following the designated party. The NCPO would revoke the Constitution for a third term with 84 votes. People would not vote. That is extortion.

However, Mr. Somchai protested the problem AND asked to withdraw the word extortion Having Mr. Thirachai say that in the suspension of the meeting, there was a signal to Whip AND did not mention the name of any person If there is no such issue, confirm What made Mr. Somchai answer that “I did not confirm Because you thought so yourself.”

So, when there is a discussion of the reserved opinion in its entirety The meeting voted It turns out that a majority of 379 votes agrees with Km.? Towards 193 votes and 19 abstentions, which causes the provisions to be reviewed.



[ad_2]